Vermont's Independent Voice
Browse News
Browse Arts + Culture
Browse Food + Drink
Browse Cannabis
Browse Music
Browse On Screen
Browse Events
Browse Classifieds
Browse Personals
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
Town Meeting Day Burlington Rejects Voting, City Service By Non-Citizens
Posted
By Alicia Freese
on Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:41 PM
Burlington voters today rejected a ballot measure to give non-citizens the right to vote in local elections.
Pushed by several Progressive city councilors, the idea slowly gained steam last year in city hall. The mayor and most other city councilors gradually went from skeptical to supportive.
But they failed to win over Burlington voters: The measure failed 58 percent to 42 percent.
Burlington voters also rejected by a margin of 55 percent to 45 percent a change that would have allowed non-citizens to serve as department heads and on city boards.
Leading up to Town Meeting Day, outspoken critics made their opposition known during spirited Front Porch Forum debates and at neighborhood planning assembly meetings. Some worried that the measure would dilute the value of citizenship.
Even if the voting initiative had passed, it was unlikely non-citizens would have made it to the polls anytime soon. The Vermont legislature would have needed to sign off on the proposal, and supporters acknowledged that it could have been a tough sell in the state capitol.
The initiative that would have allowed non-citizens to serve as department heads or city officials would not have required legislative approval.
Pushed by several Progressive city councilors, the idea slowly gained steam last year in city hall. The mayor and most other city councilors gradually went from skeptical to supportive.
But they failed to win over Burlington voters: The measure failed 58 percent to 42 percent.
Burlington voters also rejected by a margin of 55 percent to 45 percent a change that would have allowed non-citizens to serve as department heads and on city boards.
Leading up to Town Meeting Day, outspoken critics made their opposition known during spirited Front Porch Forum debates and at neighborhood planning assembly meetings. Some worried that the measure would dilute the value of citizenship.
Even if the voting initiative had passed, it was unlikely non-citizens would have made it to the polls anytime soon. The Vermont legislature would have needed to sign off on the proposal, and supporters acknowledged that it could have been a tough sell in the state capitol.
The initiative that would have allowed non-citizens to serve as department heads or city officials would not have required legislative approval.
Comments
Comments are closed.
Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.
While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.
To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.
Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.
Related Stories
About The Author
Alicia Freese
Bio:
Alicia Freese was a Seven Days staff writer from 2014 through 2018.
Alicia Freese was a Seven Days staff writer from 2014 through 2018.
