Narrow Search

Comment Archives: Stories: News + Opinion: Today

Re: “Vermont Congressional Delegation to Attend Trump Inauguration

Mr.Bast the important part of the story you left out of the Coolidge swearing in is that Coolidge became president only after the sudden death of President Harding. When Coolidge won his second term he was sworn in Washington. Also it might not be a constitutional requirement for congressmen and senators to attend, but it is important for them to support the American process. Even Hillary and Bill will be there and she lost. So if she can get over it and support America and our new president, these cry baby Democrats should get over themselves and get to the inauguration. P.S. Coolidge was a real Vermonter and a Republican. VT needs to return to its GOP roots.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by citizen on 01/18/2017 at 8:41 PM

Re: “‘Reactionary Fringe’ Pushes Back Against Mayor’s ‘Trash Talk’

"The CLC has not been a tenth as rude as its opponents."

This is simply an objectively false statement. Having closely observed the public and online debate from the beginning, the "anti" side's strategy has been to try to carpetbomb the online debate, call names, and make all kinds of wild and unsubstantiated -- and, frankly, absurd -- accusations of public corruption against those who think the project is a good idea. See the repeated inflammatory, shrill, and accusatory posts by Petrarca, Philo, VTPolicyAnalyst, Grill, etc. Mostly, the project supporters have sat back and not reacted in kind. A simple count of the negative and accusatory adjectives used by the anti's vs. the pro's in the online postings will negate your claims as to who's more "rude."

Your call for "civil debate" is one-sided. It is positional blindness. You see "us" as rude but apparently you can't even see your side's incredible rudeness because your side is morally "right." Well, guess what? We who support this project do so because we genuinely believe it is in the best interest of the city. Stop demonizing us and then accusing us of being rude merely because we don't like your personal attacks!

Have a nice day.

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by knowyourassumptions on 01/18/2017 at 7:56 PM

Re: “‘Reactionary Fringe’ Pushes Back Against Mayor’s ‘Trash Talk’

I just wanted to share my full comment, which can be found below. Thank you.

https://www.facebook.com/WinklemanforBTV/p…

Posted by Charles Winkleman on 01/18/2017 at 7:39 PM

Re: “Will Vermont Leaders Wage War Over Labor?

"Mitzi told me, 'I need a beefed-up labor presence on Commerce,'" - Seriously? Johnson is not known for giving a damn about labor. Don't fool yourselves. She is one who voted for every program under the sun and then turned around and attacked the labor force that actually had to implement those programs. She is no friend to labor.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Roy on 01/18/2017 at 5:55 PM

Re: “‘Reactionary Fringe’ Pushes Back Against Mayor’s ‘Trash Talk’

Well well well. I see there is a mobilized force, drowning this thread of comments in insults to Genese and the CLC. Even a bystander can see a theme here. Trying to discredit the opposition is a long political tradition. "The CLC spent months yelling at them"? Think about it - this line is fatuous. I've followed many of these stories in Seven Days, and never before have I seen two, three and four dozen folks determined to destroy someone's credibility. Can you truly picture someone yelling for months? All I have witnessed is their speaking up at Public Meetings and circulating flyers. Some have carried signs - but the Mayor is the fellow who spent a bunch of money (thousands of dollars) on printed materials to convince voters - and he still just barely got a majority vote. The voters of the Wards where the properties are located were against the project, though their Council members asked them to vote for it. This has created what some feel is a need for new representation. Could we have a more civil discussion please? The CLC has not been a tenth as rude as its opponents.

1 like, 10 dislikes
Posted by stickinthemud on 01/18/2017 at 5:10 PM

Re: “Vermont Congressional Delegation to Attend Trump Inauguration

I'm in agreement with Leonard Bast, and it's probably a good political move too ...its very clear that currying favor with a clearly punitive and mentally unstable President can be possibly helpful later on. If we all live, that is.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Christopher Maloney on 01/18/2017 at 4:26 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

John, please do not use the term "nothing burger". For some reason it makes me gag. I only know of two NBs, one in Burlington and one in Putney. Both are not worthy of comment.

5 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Walter Moses on 01/18/2017 at 4:04 PM

Re: “Backs to the Wall: Vermont’s Sole Juvenile Lockup Is Hard Up for Cash

How many millions were fraudulently misappropriated from Medicare over the years and why aren't the Feds suing for the return of the money?

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by JimM on 01/18/2017 at 3:03 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

Here's an example of an ethics problem: When I was under criminal investigation by the Attorney General for allegedly practicing law without a license, it became clear that House Speaker Shap Smith's law firm was involved. Though they didn't admit it until the day the investigation was closed, those of us looking at the redacted complaint identified that two attorneys at Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew were involved in bringing the complaint to the AG's office. A reporter told me he asked House Speaker Smith if he had a fire wall between his speaker's office and his law firm. Answer: "no".

8 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by A. Smith on 01/18/2017 at 2:45 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

Seeing how the "big boys" can throw money around, one wonders how they would define the governor's mantra,"affordability".

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by jad1245 on 01/18/2017 at 2:37 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

I comment on articles that bore me, too, Kathy.

2 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Scott Pavek on 01/18/2017 at 2:35 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

Obsession is as boring in print as it was in your blog.

9 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Kathy on 01/18/2017 at 1:51 PM

Re: “Will Vermont Leaders Wage War Over Labor?

Scott sounds like Trump in merging the Agency that promotes business interests with the agency charged with protecting workers rights. Are you sure he didn't tweet his announcement?

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by JoRoVT on 01/18/2017 at 1:37 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

Thanks for contributing, Walter.

8 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Scott Pavek on 01/18/2017 at 12:14 PM

Re: “The Usual Suspects: Who Funded Scott's Inaugural Gala?

Once again the "writer's" (I use that term very loosely here, as this useless troglodyte can barely form a readable sentence) lack of self-esteem, and personal grudges bleed into this once-interesting column. Listen buddy, we all know you're in love with Phil Scott, and, being the delicate flower you are, it hurts you deeply that he doesn't want anything to do with you. I get it. But it isn't interesting, or even mildly amusing to read.

14 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by Walter Cronkite on 01/18/2017 at 12:05 PM

Re: “Lawmakers Leery of Scott’s Proposed Labor, Commerce Merger

Hey...anyway to get the budget under control by shrinking the bureaucracy - go for it. ...but the names he is attempting to use ' DEPT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY? That sounds like something Quebec does. ( til they change it 18 months later)

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by ArtBell on 01/18/2017 at 11:00 AM

Re: “Vermont Congressional Delegation to Attend Trump Inauguration

What angers you more, the Russians (allegedly) exposing Hillary Clinton's web of lies or the fact that Hillary Clinton has such a web of lies to expose?

9 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Mark Lade on 01/18/2017 at 10:08 AM

Re: “Vermont Congressional Delegation to Attend Trump Inauguration

To those commenters who seem to have failed high school civics and United States history, attending the inaugural ceremonies has absolutely nothing to do with upholding the Constitution. The ceremonies are entirely without connection to the Constitution, except for the administering of the oath, which need not be accompanied by any ceremony at all. Boycotting the ceremony is NOT boycotting the Constitution or showing it any disrespect. Plenty of presidents have taken the oath with no ceremony at all. We Vermonters should know this above all others, since Calvin Coolidge took the oath by the light of a kerosene lamp on August 3, 1923 in the parlor of his family home in Plymouth Notch -- after which he went back to bed.

17 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Leonard Bast on 01/18/2017 at 9:38 AM

Re: “Judicial Board Agrees to Give Scott More Justice Candidates

Roy you evidently didn't read the story.

8 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Kathy on 01/18/2017 at 8:26 AM

Re: “Vermont Congressional Delegation to Attend Trump Inauguration

I don't see how any reasonable person can disregard Russia interfering with the election. Can you imagine the outcry if the positions were reversed and Russia had assisted in electing Clinton? I am positive no republican would attend or support the inauguration and they would be setting up impeachment hearings.

7 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Penelope on 01/18/2017 at 7:48 AM

Social Club

Like Seven Days contests and events? Join the club!

See an example of this newsletter...

Recent Comments

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative
newsletters:

All content © 2017 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation