sell your ride
post your service
sell your stuff
post your class
browse all jobs
post a job
post your listing
If you're looking for "I Spys," dating or LTRs, this is your scene.
If you're looking for full-on kink or group play, you'll get what you need here.
This is McCarthy-style orchestrated outrage
operating without intellectual integrity:
Mumia was convicted, but his trial was a sham.
If Tom Buckley of CCTA is quoted correctly, he spoke a falsehood.
From the article:
board chairman Tom Buckley of Winooski. "The Union’s refusal of binding arbitration
prevents the parties from engaging in a fair and neutral process that would prevent
a strike and reach a resolution.”
He probably knows what he says isn't true, which would make it a lie,
albeit a familiar form of lie in labor disputes.
Mediation is also a fair and neutral process.
Binding arbitration isn't necessarily a fair or neutral process,
otherwise why would credit card companies insist on it?
When you get a 54-0 vote against you, you might wonder
if you'd really been negotiating in good faith.
These drivers are a long way from being overpaid,
and their grievances, as reported ("fret"? really?), sound just.
Amen to that, which, if read with Scalia-like literal mindedness, would support the notion that lobbying is unconstitutional (except when it's for the common benefit). So how do you use "lobbyist" and "common benefit" in a sentence that's honest about both?
Thinking about professionalism -- where is it in this piece that gives John Hollar a chance for a cheapshot falsehood but gives Gwen Hallsmith no chance at all to reply....
Great quote from John Hollar: "I don't see any ethical limitations or problems...."To see ethical problems, all Hollar has to do is look in the mirror. Hollar's conflict of interest is blatant -- and active -- he's hired to represent private banks -- he attacks Gwen Hallsmith for promoting public banking -- how much more obvious can a shill get? Hollar's March 19, 2013 email pressuring the city manager: âTo repeat myself ad nauseum, I still don't see how our city's chief economic development officer can hold and promote views that are fundamentally anti-capitalist in nature.âHere's the story in more detail -- it paints a picture of Hollar being relentlessly "uninvolved" until the city manager joins in the lynching: http://readersupportednews.org...
When Hollar says "I had nothing to do with it," that is a transparent falsehood (being a lawyer he can probably persuade some people it was not an actual lie). In March 2013 Hollar sent an email to city manager Fraser in which he made his involvement pretty clear:âTo repeat myself ad nauseum, I still don't see how our city's chief economic development officer can hold and promote views that are fundamentally anti-capitalist in nature.â Well, of course a hired bank lobbyist would say that. Here's a well-sourced report in support on what was, in effect, the public lynching of Gwen Hallsmith: http://readersupportednews.org...