Pin It
Favorite

Legalization Question Goes up in Smoke at Council Meeting 

click to enlarge 6a00d83451b91969e20133f4a62c18970b-pi.jpg

An effort to ask Burlington voters in November if they support the legalization, taxation and regulation of cannabis and hemp went up in smoke Monday night when the measure failed by a six-six tie vote of the Burlington City Council.

The resolution was offered by Councilor Emma Mulvaney-Stanak (P-Ward 3) and backed by five of her colleagues: Councilors Ed Adrian (D-Ward 1), David Berezniak (D-Ward 2), Sharon Bushor (I-Ward 1), Bram Kranichfeld (D-Ward 2) and Joan Shannon (D-Ward 5).

Those voting against the resolution were: Councilors Paul Decelles (R-Ward 7), Vince Dober (R-Ward 7), Nancy Kaplan (D-Ward 4), Bill Keogh (D-Ward 5), Karen Paul (I-Ward 6) and Kurt Wright (R-Ward 4).

Councilor Mary Kehoe (D-Ward 6) was absent and one Ward 3 council seat remains vacant.

A group of citizens had gathered about 1200 signatures, just shy of the 1600 needed to get an item on the city ballot. The ballot question would have been non-binding.

California and the city of Detroit are weighing in on the issue this fall, too.

The council deliberated on the motion for about a half hour. Several people spoke during a public forum in support of the measure, including independent candidate for governor Dennis Steele and independent candidate for lieutenant governor Peter Garritano.

Before the debate, Councilor Adrian passed around a bag of chocolate covered malt balls, "in case anyone gets the munchies during the discussion."

Adrian noted that "pot is not a panacea" but he thought it was worth allowing voters to weigh in on the issue to give lawmakers in Montpelier some guidance on the topic. Lawmakers have debated whether to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana. Montpelier voters in March voted three to one in favor of decriminalization.

Rep. Jason Lorber (D-Burlington) urged the council to support the resolution.

"Should we make alcohol illegal? We tried that and what happened was we were putting all of the profits into the hands of organized and sometimes unorganized crime," said Lorber. "The same is happening with keeping marijuana illegal."

It would have cost the city about $8000 to put the question to voters due to the cost of printing and distributing a citywide ballot, said Assistant CAO Scott Schrader. It would cost less if other questions were added. The Board of Finance is weighing whether to add a bond question for the Burlington Electric Department.

Councilors Decelles and Wright suggested the citizens should keep gathering signature and set a goal of getting the extra names in time for the March election.

"We don't put any time restriction for ballot questions, certainly between now and the March elections," said Wright. "They still have the ability to collect the signatures they need and come back."

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Tags: ,

Pin It
Favorite

More by Shay Totten

About The Author

Shay Totten

Shay Totten

Bio:
Shay Totten wrote "Fair Game," a weekly political column, from April 2008-December 2011.

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

Seven Days moderates comments in order to ensure a civil environment. Please treat the comments section as you would a town meeting, dinner party or classroom discussion. In other words, keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.

Recent Comments

Social Club

Like Seven Days contests and events? Join the club!

See an example of this newsletter...

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative
e-newsletters:

All content © 2016 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So Champlain St Ste 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation