Sorrell, ACLU Clash Over Open Records Legislation | Off Message
Pin It

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Sorrell, ACLU Clash Over Open Records Legislation

Posted By on Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM

click to enlarge sorell.jpg
Bill Sorrell and Allen Gilbert found themselves in familiar territory Thursday morning: disagreeing about how much access the public should have to police records.

As the Senate Judiciary Committee began work on a bill to increase access to law enforcement records, the attorney general and head of the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont gave conflicting advice about how far to extend the public's right to know.

Vermont's public records laws are among the country's weakest, allowing some 250 exemptions. But a string of reports about actual and alleged police misconduct have spurred calls for greater police transparency.

Gilbert urged the committee to adopt the federal Freedom of Information standard, which presumes public access to criminal investigative records absent a specific harm that might be caused by their release. He noted that 21 other states and the District of Columbia have already adopted that standard. He said some Vermont police agencies have become "overzealous" in their secrecy, giving the impression that they have something to hide. And that, he said, has eroded trust in police overall.

"How can people trust what police are doing if they can’t even the see the records of something they did five, 10, 25 years ago?" Gilbert asked. "That's really extreme."

The Shumlin administration has also proposed adopting the federal open-records standard, but wants an exemption for any records that could "reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" — a provision that could leave law enforcment agencies with broad discretion.

Sorrell (pictured) countered with a less sweeping proposal: He wants the law to say criminal case files become public only when they involve alleged wrongdoing by a police officer while on duty. Files relating to investigations of private citizens should remain off-limits, he said.

To illustrate how opening criminal case files could invade the privacy of Vermonters, Sorrell cited one of the state's most notorious murder cases: that of Patricia Scoville, a 28-year-old woman who was raped and murdered in Stowe in 1991.

"Eighty-two men were asked to give a sample of their DNA as part of that investigation," Sorrell said. "Some men, for reasons that they were known to hike in the Glens Falls area, would be subject to having their names disclosed as once being suspect in a rape/murder case."

Sorrell said his office prosecuted another sexual assault case in which the victim kept a list of sexual partners with narratives about each encounter. Would those become public under the federal FOIA standard, the attorney general asked?

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Sears seemed to agree with Sorrell, noting that Scoville's father and he have a mutual friend in Bennington. "Your examples are ones that hit home to me," Sears said.

Photo by Andy Bromage

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Pin It

Did you appreciate this story?

Show us your ❤️ by becoming a Seven Days Super Reader.

About The Author

Andy Bromage

Andy Bromage

Andy Bromage was a Seven Days staff writer from 2009-2012, and the news editor from 2012-2013.

More by Andy Bromage


Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2019 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation