House Votes to End Philosophical Vaccination Exemption | Off Message
Pin It
Favorite

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

House Votes to End Philosophical Vaccination Exemption

Posted By on Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:56 PM

click to enlarge From left, House Speaker Shap Smith, Health Care Committee chair Bill Lippert, Rep. Paul Dame and House Minority Leader Don Turner discuss vaccination legislation on the House floor Tuesday. - TERRI HALLENBECK
  • Terri Hallenbeck
  • From left, House Speaker Shap Smith, Health Care Committee chair Bill Lippert, Rep. Paul Dame and House Minority Leader Don Turner discuss vaccination legislation on the House floor Tuesday.
By an 85-57 vote that knew no political or geographical boundaries, the House agreed Tuesday to remove the philosophical exemption that allows parents to opt out of vaccinations for their children.

The move would require a nod from the Senate and the governor’s signature to become law. Parents could still opt for a religious exemption, though some argue that fewer will.

“The right of a parent sometimes is trumped by what’s in the best interest of society as a whole,” said Rep. Paul Poirier (I-Barre), who championed the change. “Vermont’s immunization rate is the lowest of all New England states. We need to change that.”

The vote came a day after the House hosted a packed and passionate public hearing. House members followed that with nearly five hours of debate Tuesday during which members nearly opted instead for a compromise. By a 73-71 vote, the House defeated an amendment to replace the state's philosophical and religious exemptions with a tougher-to-obtain alternative-medicine exemption.

Watching the afternoon debate from the House gallery, Jennifer Stella of Waitsfield, executive director of the Vermont Coalition for Vaccine Choice, was disappointed. "The Vermont House just made a grave mistake that forces parents into untenable situations,” she said.

Her organization is among those that contend that vaccinations cause serious health problems for some children. Vaccination supporters argue that the lack of immunizations is far more dangerous and that Vermont needs to boost its vaccination rate to keep preventable diseases at bay. Statistics indicate that states with looser vaccine rules have lower vaccination rates. 

Stella’s group supported the near-miss of an alternative that had been proposed by Rep. Anne Donahue (R-Northfield). Donahue said she wanted to create a higher bar but to still offer parents an exemption.

“Some parents, in the best interests of their children, want to make a different decision,” Donahue said.

Donahue’s amendment would have created a new exemption. To qualify, parents would have had to follow a more rigorous process than checking a box, as parents can do now with the philosophical exemption. Parents would have had to sign an affidavit saying their children were receiving viable alternative medicine, that they had read about the value of vaccinations, completed an online form and had consulted with a health care professional.

Donahue won support from those who thought her exemption would increase vaccination rates while still offering an option to those who strongly oppose vaccinations.

“I feel like the member from Northfield has offered us a middle way,” said Rep. Mike Mrowicki (D-Putney).

Mrowicki read a letter in which his physician, Clif Steinberg of Westminster, raised questions about mandating vaccines. “We should all be uncomfortable with mandatory medical treatment,” Mrowicki said.

Mrowicki opted not to reveal that Steinberg is a naturopathic physician who received a doctor of naturopathy degree. Later in the debate, Rep. George Till (D-Jericho), who is a medical doctor, pointed that out. “It is clear how the mainline medical community feels about this,” said Till, an outspoken supporter of removing the exemption.

Tuesday’s debate defied political affiliation. Even the Democratic leadership team came down on opposite sides.

Speaker Shap Smith (D-Morristown), who does not vote unless there’s a tie, supported removing the exemption. House majority leader Sarah Copeland Hanzas (D-Bradford) voted against removing the philosophical exemption, while assistant majority leader Kate Webb (D-Shelburne) voted for it.

House Health Care Committee chair Bill Lippert (D-Hinesburg), who spent days overseeing heated testimony on the issue, voted against removing the exemption. He supported Donahue’s alternative.

“I don’t think it’s going to achieve the goal,” Lippert said afterward. “People are just going to take the religious exemption.”

The Senate voted 18-11 last month to remove the philosophical exemption. The Senate would have to approve changes the House made to send the bill to Gov. Peter Shumlin. The governor has indicated he’d prefer not to remove the exemption but might sign the bill anyway.


Tags: , , , , ,

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Pin It
Favorite

About The Author

Terri Hallenbeck

Terri Hallenbeck

Bio:
Terri Hallenbeck is a Seven Days staff writer covering politics, the Legislature and state issues.

More by Terri Hallenbeck

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.

Social Club

Like Seven Days contests and events? Join the club!

See an example of this newsletter...

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative
newsletters:

All content © 2017 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation