Montpeculiar: On Bill Markup Day, We Ate Cake | Off Message
Pin It
Favorite

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Opinion
Montpeculiar: On Bill Markup Day, We Ate Cake

Posted By on Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:01 PM

click to enlarge We ate cake — but not this one. - DREAMSTIME
  • Dreamstime
  • We ate cake — but not this one.
There's a legislative process called "bill markup" which is incredibly important for making good law, and is also the Boston Marathon of legislative tedium.

When a committee considers a bill, it hears testimony, discusses the bill, amends it, gets more testimony, discusses and amends yet again — lather, rinse, repeat.

After all that, when the committee is almost ready to vote on the bill, it has a markup session. This is a process of going through the bill line-by-line, raising potential issues, discussing, debating, dithering, and finalizing the language in the bill. Which they've gotta do because, after all, this thing might become law, and they can't afford to overlook mistakes or unintended consequences. Still, it tries the patience of one and all.
click to enlarge montpeculiar2.jpg

On Wednesday, the Senate Government Operations Committee was scheduled to do markup on S.8, the ethics reform bill. Thirty-two pages of legalese.

Committee chair Sen. Jeanette White (D-Windham) is no dummy. She knew it was going to be a long, tedious afternoon. So she brought cake.

A big, moist, appealing, almost sensual triple chocolate truffle something-or-other.

Which she placed dead center on the committee table.

"Did you get that at La Brioche?" inquired Sen. Alison Clarkson (D-Windsor), name-dropping the popular Montpelier bakery.

"Nope, Shaw's," White replied.

Amazing what supermarkets are turning out these days.

As the committee trudged through the arcana of S.8, the cake sat there, enticing the eye, watering the mouth as it wafted out the gentle fragrance of chocolate.

Most of the discussion was both trivial and congenial, but as 3 p.m. approached, it became clear the committee was deeply divided on one question.
click to enlarge Sen. Jeanette White - FILE: PAUL HEINTZ
  • File: Paul Heintz
  • Sen. Jeanette White
The ethics bill includes a pay-to-play provision, designed to prevent political donors from landing no-bid, single-source contracts. Language applying to businesses was duly hammered out. Basically, a for-profit entity or individual who makes a donation to a candidate for governor is barred from receiving single-source contracts from the state for one year. The idea is to avoid "pay-to-play" — giving money in the hope of landing state contracts.

The committee then turned to a section covering nonprofit organizations. That "pay-to-play" provision didn't apply to them, and Sens. Claire Ayer (D-Addison) and Brian Collamore (R-Rutland) wondered why.

Clarkson argued that nonprofits don't have the same potential for "pecuniary gain." Ayer and Collamore argued that while nonprofits may lack the profit motive, they clearly benefit from getting state contracts. And a lot of nonprofits get state funding. Hospitals and designated agencies, for instance. If you run a nonprofit or work for one, and you don't get that state contract, your job could be on the line.

The debate grew heated, and it looked like Ayer and Collamore had the support of Sen. Chris Pearson (P/D-Chittenden). That would be a majority of the five-member panel.
click to enlarge Sen. Claire Ayer - FILE: JEB WALLACE-BRODEUR
  • File: Jeb Wallace-Brodeur
  • Sen. Claire Ayer
That's when White pulled a pair of master strokes. First, she announced that as soon as the point was settled, there would be a five-minute recess and cake would be served.

Next, she took a strategically-ordered straw poll of the committee. She began with herself and Clarkson, two votes against applying the pay-to-play ban to nonprofits. Then she took Collamore's vote in favor.

And then she put the question to Ayer.

If Ayer had voted with Collamore, it seemed likely that Pearson would follow suit. The debate would go on. The cake would remain untouched.

Ayer backed down. She voted with Clarkson and White. Pearson quickly followed. Game, set, match.

Recess.

Cake!

Full disclosure: slices of cake were offered to everyone in the room, including two reporters — yours truly and Mark Johnson of VTDigger.org. We both accepted.

And it tasted even better than it looked. Deeeeeee-lish.


Tags: , , , , , ,

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Pin It
Favorite

About The Author

John Walters

John Walters

Bio:
John Walters is the political columnist for Seven Days. He is a longtime journalist and spent many years as a news anchor and host for public radio stations in Michigan and New Hampshire. He’s the author of Roads Less Traveled: Visionary New England Lives, published by Plaidswede Press.

More by John Walters

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.

Latest in Off Message

Social Club

Like Seven Days contests and events? Join the club!

See an example of this newsletter...

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative
newsletters:

All content © 2017 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation