Back to the Future for the Waterfront's Biggest Building | City | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Seven Days needs your financial support!

Back to the Future for the Waterfront's Biggest Building 

Local Matters

Published October 18, 2005 at 11:59 p.m.

BURLINGTON -- If you think it's cumbersome to design via committee, try incorporating the entire city into the process. When Burlington officials proposed leasing the old Moran Generating Plant to the YMCA, they thought they were responding to a public mandate to provide a public, indoor recreation center on the waterfront. But residents last March had other ideas; 60 percent voted against it.

So the city went back to square one. In June, the Community and Economic Development Office solicited ideas for what to do with the 44,142-square-foot facility. They received more than 600, from turning it into a Circus Smirkus Academy or Sydney-style opera house to leaving it exactly as it is. CEDO staff then distilled those suggestions into 38 general approaches and analyzed each in terms of costs, impacts and benefits.

A farmers' market would be relatively inexpensive to construct, for example, but it would only benefit the public for part of the year, and may not meet the Public Trust Definition the law requires for the site. A library branch would clearly satisfy the Public Trust requirement, but it would come with a hefty price tag and replicate an existing facility. There definitely isn't another casino in the area, but putting one on the waterfront would have an enormous environmental impact and would violate current zoning and other rules.

Now the public is being invited to weigh in once again, at public forums and through a survey being mailed to every Burlington household. The first forum took place Tuesday night, and two more are scheduled -- Wednesday, October 19, at Champlain School at 7 p.m., and the following noon at City Hall. Residents are being asked to evaluate the 38 approaches, and to prioritize the evaluation criteria. Do they care more about benefiting many people, for example, or limiting noise? Is containing city costs more or less important than expanding parking?

This round of input should help narrow down the list of possible uses, according to CEDO Director Michael Monte. "Some of the 38 ideas may look like they have no support, and others like they have a lot of support," he says. "It will cut out some of the clutter."

CEDO hopes that the City Council will discuss these results on November 21, and put another proposal on the March ballot. But even with all this public input, there's no guarantee the next idea -- whatever it is -- will fly. "It isn't like we didn't do it before," says Monte, noting that voters rejected the Y proposal for a wide variety of reasons. Ultimately, he suggests, "The implementation will create either support or lack of support."

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

More By This Author

About The Author

Ruth Horowitz


Comments are closed.

Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.

While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2022 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401

Advertising Policy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Help
Website powered by Foundation