Burlington Police Scanners Go Silent - to the Public | News | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Seven Days needs your financial support!

Burlington Police Scanners Go Silent - to the Public 

Local Matters

Published December 22, 2009 at 6:39 a.m.

Brandi Barbeau, emergency communication specialist - ANDY DUBACK
  • Andy Duback
  • Brandi Barbeau, emergency communication specialist

Tune in to police radios in most Vermont towns, and you’ll hear patrol officers and dispatchers broadcasting real-time information about accidents, break-ins and occasionally major crimes.

Tune in to the Burlington Police Department’s primary radio channel — 460.125 megahertz on any police scanner — and you’ll hear nothing but static, interrupted by a droning buzz like a motorboat.

Without fanfare last spring, Burlington police encrypted their main broadcast channel, making it impossible to hear anything being discussed over the most commonly used police radio frequency. Several of Burlington’s lesser-used channels remain unencrypted, as does the city fire department’s channel.

The encryption came in response to what Police Chief Mike Schirling says was a growing problem: criminals, or teams of criminals, using police scanners and text messaging to anticipate and evade police. Someone listening to a scanner at home can track police, Schirling says, and relay their movements via text message to an accomplice breaking into cars or selling drugs on a street corner. The encryption will improve public safety and officer safety, the chief says.

“Scanners are pretty pervasive,” Schirling says. “The difference is that now with contemporary cellphone and messaging technology, not everybody needs to carry a scanner with them. It has a force-multiplying effect for them that is pretty significant.”

Criminals using scanners to outfox police isn’t a new problem. But until recently, the technology required to digitize and encrypt police radios was cost prohibitive, Schirling says. Burlington police encrypted their radios as part of a five-year, $1.5 million upgrade to the department’s communications system funded through grants.

BPD’s radio silence has left radio hobbyists such as Jim Lawrence puzzled — and more than a little peeved. Lawrence lives in Randolph Center and wrote to Seven Days to express concern about the encryption.

He says the blackout raises several important questions: Why wasn’t the public informed about the switch and allowed a comment period? With Burlington police encrypted, how are neighboring departments such as Winooski and South Burlington to be informed of a major incident affecting multiple communities? Why remove virtually all police chatter from the public channels? Why not just reserve the encrypted channel for the most sensitive information?

“Prior to encryption, the police had literally hundreds of extra eyes and ears who monitored their communications and could assist them if they saw someone the police were looking for and provide tips,” writes Lawrence, who stresses he is not “anticop.”

Chief Schirling explains that police around Vermont have a common channel — referred to as Channel 2 — that’s used by all local departments and the state police for sharing information. If something big went down that affected multiple towns, that’s the channel emergency first responders would use.

Burlington’s nonencrypted police channels are mostly used for agency-to-agency communication, long-distance communication and, at times, when multiple events are happening simultaneously. A good example is the Burlington marathon, Deputy Chief Walt Decker says, when police, event staff and paramedics would require additional radio channels.

Police radio encryption is a hot topic on websites such as ScanNewEngland.net, where scanner junkies debate whether barring the public from monitoring police chatter is a breach of government transparency.

WPTZ Channel 5 news director Sinan Sadar says that by staying tuned to police activity, the media can quickly inform thousands of people about a public safety hazard.

“Now I don’t know how we’re going to communicate that,” Sadar says. “Does someone have to write a press release? Does someone Tweet it? Adding another layer of communication where public safety is at risk, I don’t think helps a lot.”

Schirling argues Burlingtonians have numerous avenues for getting police information, including daily arrest logs, police ride-alongs and the Nixle system, a Twitter-like service that blasts neighborhood-specific crime alerts and public safety information to subscribers.

Burlington is the first of many Chittenden County police departments headed toward radio encryption, Schirling says. South Burlington, Essex and the University of Vermont are also transitioning to encrypted broadcasts, he notes.

For scanner hobbyists like Lawrence, that can only mean more static.

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

More By This Author

About The Author

Andy Bromage

Andy Bromage

Andy Bromage was a Seven Days staff writer from 2009-2012, and the news editor from 2012-2013.


Comments are closed.

Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.

While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2022 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401

Advertising Policy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Help
Website powered by Foundation