liamgriffin | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Member since Apr 13, 2015



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Bike Share Launches in Burlington, Winooski and South Burlington

@Barbara, there is a more affordable option: Greenride for All provides $5 monthly or $25 annual membership for income qualified residents. The program also includes a cash payment option for those who do not have a debit or credit card and membership sign up help.
More info here:

7 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by liamgriffin on 04/12/2018 at 11:03 AM

Re: “Bike Share Launches in Burlington, Winooski and South Burlington

Bike share is a huge community asset that I hope people appreciate & support. $50 a year (or $25 for qualified people) is a small price to pay for access to affordable efficient transportation. Kudos to the folks at CATMA for getting this off the ground. I'm really looking forward to Phase 2 of the roll out when we'll start to see more hubs that serve the different neighborhoods in Burlington.

17 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by liamgriffin on 04/11/2018 at 10:56 AM

Re: “Champlain Parkway Opponents Threaten to Derail Burlington Project

"Among the coalition members is Steve Goodkind, a former director of Burlington's Department of Public Works, who said he oversaw the project plans for 15 years" - so if Goodkind was in charge for so long, why didn't he fix it when it was his job to? The fact that he's now involved in a lawsuit to stop this (and other things) from happening in Burlington is laughable. Maybe somebody needs to remind him that he lost the Mayor's race a few years ago since he seems to be trying to run this city from behind what seems to be an endless number of lawsuits and protests.

52 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by liamgriffin on 04/04/2018 at 10:29 AM

Re: “The Parmelee Post: Burlington Officials Face Backlash After Repairing Potholes Without Public Input

Surprisingly accurate for a satire piece. Kudos to Parmalee for pointing out that the opponents to the changes on North Ave seem to care more about their commute times than the safety of their neighbors.

22 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by liamgriffin on 07/10/2017 at 10:31 AM

Re: “Burlington Man Turns Waterfront Rocks, Driftwood Into Public Art

This is not my comment, but I share this sentiment & feel like leaving up piles of "art" in a natural environment is a bit off putting.

"I am an avid stone balancer. I teach classes on the art form and give presentations on it regularly. I published the first widely available guide book on rock and stone balancing. I love this art form and want to see it grow.

However, I am very concerned about the practice of leaving stacks of stones littering natural areas. There is a large worldwide community of stone balance artists who share this concern, and who practice a leave-no-trace approach in creating our temporary art. We build our balances, take some photos, and then dismantle. We strive especially to avoid disturbing natural and protected areas"

I might suggest that the artist consider that the people knocking over his works are not necessarily troublemakers. They might just prefer the waterfront left in its natural state.

3 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by liamgriffin on 03/31/2017 at 7:33 PM

Re: “In Burlington, Upward Growth or 'Vertical Sprawl'?

If, as stated in this article "Coalition members argue that it's possible to make Burlington a more densely populated city by constructing three- to six-story mid-rise buildings on parcels that today languish as parking lots or function as gas stations or single-story retail establishments." Then why did the Coalition oppose any new housing development in the South End? There are plenty of single story retail establishments that have been redeveloped in the South End in recent years, all of which could have been multi story mixed use, but due to the continued protests from the CLC and others, there is no new housing allowed in the enterprise zone.

If the CLC supports three- to six-story mid-rise buildings, why all the opposition to the BC redevelopment, which fits right into that mixed use sweet spot?

CLC members consistently say they aren't against density or development, but then oppose any project that arises where density changes or development happens. You can't have it both ways...

10 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by liamgriffin on 03/02/2017 at 2:15 PM

Re: “Artists Say South End Proposal Would Mean Gentrification

When are people going to figure out that Burlington has a town line? The town can't grow bigger without infill & rezoning, so developers will just keep building outside Burlington which will create more problems with traffic & parking for the people who live here. If you don't want the southern connector, the best way to reduce that traffic is to build more housing in town so people don't have to drive everywhere.

"The city should instead beef up its affordable housing regulations so new units built in other parts of Burlington are not overpriced." - Sure, so the solution is to build it somewhere else, just not in your neighborhood? Classic NIMBY. Where exactly in town are people not opposed to new development right now?

Meanwhile, Essex, SoBurl, Winooski, Williston and every town around Burlington will continue to grow. Since there is zero new housing supply, prices here will continue to go up, and more people will move out of town. Density and development are not bad words, if done properly.

32 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by liamgriffin on 06/17/2015 at 1:24 PM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2018 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation