Mike Covey | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Mike Covey 
Member since Mar 2, 2014



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Vermont Plans to Step Up Logging on Public Land Around Camel's Hump

The area of greatest concern within the forestry plan is the significant and glaring lack of maintenance planned for early successional habitat. I understand the difficulty of managing a parcel with so much elevation change and varied habitat, however, equally important is the critical nature of early successional habitat to the greatest number of our wildlife species. The plan, as written, prescribes a meager 1-2% of the harvestable lands to be maintained as early successional habitat. This is far too small a percentage. Habitat studies conducted by the Ruffed Grouse Society indicated with a great deal of clarity that a well-maintained forest with 15-20% kept in early successional habitat provided a great deal more benefit to wildlife than large tracts of older growth forests. While this may be a difficult challenge for the unit, it would be good for the stewardship team to reassess the proposed numbers, consider even-aged management in addition to uneven-aged management, and at least make an attempt to get them closer to a desirable percentage. It was suggested by a team member that the small percentage was an attempt to mimic natural processes. We must question why the team is willing to entertain that idea when we have information available which can improve the habitat and experience for both our wild populations and our citizens.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Mike Covey on 04/15/2018 at 2:35 PM

Re: “One Controversial Coyote Hunt Is Canceled, and Another Crops Up

In October, Mrs. Galdenzi and her husband both took to Front Page Forum exhorting folks to post their land over deer hunting as well. Not only did they indicate that deer hunting was a terrible thing, they offered to supply posters. The simple fact of the matter is that Mrs. Galdenzi, a vegan, is opposed to any and all utilization of not only wildlife, but animals in general. That's fine for her, but marginalizing and working to ostracize fellow community members in an attempt to force them into the same choices she makes is fundamentally wrong.

She has repeatedly and openly stated that sporting conservationists (hunters and trappers), are a minority and therefore their interests are insignificant. We don't accept this treatment of our LGBT community, our developmentally delayed community, or any of our myriad ethnic communities. I challenge anyone to give me a single rational reason that we should accept her attempts at bullying the hunting and trapping community.

Hunters and trappers are multidimensional members of your communities. They are teachers, doctors, students, mothers; and they deserve the same consideration as every other lifestyle receives for their contributions. Perhaps instead of blindly judging based on the propaganda of an agenda driven organization, folks should go speak with outdoorspeople and learn about the heritage, camaraderie, and connection with the land that draws them outside.

138 likes, 81 dislikes
Posted by Mike Covey on 01/12/2018 at 12:23 AM

Re: “Up in Arms: Bill Would Let Cops Take Guns in Domestic Violence Cases

No mention of the Fourth or Fifth Amendments, the real casualties of this bill. While it does have Second Amendment ramifications, it goes far beyond that with its overreach. This bill presumes guilt in contradiction to the Fifth, and legalizes the unlawful search for and seizure of private property without any conviction of guilt in violation of the Fourth. Keep in mind that the Constitution does not enumerate rights "granted" to the citizenry by government, but is the restraint of government. THESE RIGHTS ARE UNASSAILABLE, and for this article to mention neither the Fourth or Fifth Amendment violations inherent in this horrible piece of legislation is nothing short of shameful.

There are a great deal of folks with an irrational fear of firearms. By focusing on guns, we ignore the greater concern, the removal of our rights to trial and freedom from unwarranted search and seizure. What will this apply to next?

Generally, the responsible thing to do with a mess is clean it up, not try to pass it off as somehow beneficial. This bill is a clear attempt to cater to the gun-control crowd as they grasp at straws for ANYTHING that can be spun to pass off as a "win".

In closing, it is my understanding that after noting what a mess this bill is, one committee member suggested that rather than continue discussion in committee, they should "just vote on it". This bill is garbage, and even those supporting it are clearly aware of the fact.

25 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Mike Covey on 03/25/2017 at 1:04 AM

Re: “Senator Plans Push for Gun Bill Despite Slim Prospects

It seems the people are speaking quite clearly. Are you hearing them Mr. Baruth?

29 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Mike Covey on 01/08/2017 at 8:33 AM

Re: “Senator Plans Push for Gun Bill Despite Slim Prospects

Former Senator John Campbell knew better than to run again after his gun control nonsense last session. Next election, Chittenden county residents need to send Baruth the message. He has outlived his usefulness, and needs to be retired. Perhaps gardening would better suit him.

Vermonters have been quite clear on this every session. NO. It's really that simple.

47 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Mike Covey on 01/07/2017 at 8:05 AM

Re: “Walters: GOP Leader ‘Concerned’ About Scott’s Shumlin Holdovers

Gobeille shouldn't even be in charge of a paper clip at this point, but keeping Mr. Porter on as F&W Commissioner was a solid, bipartisan appointment. The man understands the social, political, and biological aspects of the department's work; and is dedicated to the welfare of the resource.

5 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Mike Covey on 01/03/2017 at 5:57 AM

Re: “Sue Minter on Her Loss, Gender and What's Next

When did 7Days start running humor as news? Blaming gender? Seriously? Minter lost because she never had any intent to represent Vermonters. She was the first candidate to ever run for statewide office on a platform of gun control. That is a political death sentence here in Vermont. We have a proud tradition of firing candidates who attack Article 16 of the Vermont state Constitution, so why would we possibly consider electing someone who commits to doing so? Why even Senator Campbell, for all his tenure and power, knew enough to retire gracefully after the gun control debacle he tried to force through last year, yet not once does this article mention the gravity of taking such positions. If you are going to report on something like this, at least be honest rather than trying to deflect to so obvious a red herring. To be blunt, Sue Minter shot herself in the foot.

22 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Mike Covey on 12/09/2016 at 7:10 AM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2018 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation