Supreme Court Denies Immunity for Top Burlington Official | News | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Seven Days needs your financial support!

Supreme Court Denies Immunity for Top Burlington Official 

Published December 14, 2010 at 12:18 p.m.

The Vermont Supreme Court has denied a last-ditch appeal by Burlington's Chief Administrative Officer Jonathan Leopold to be granted immunity from a citizen lawsuit seeking immediate repayment to taypayers of $17 million loaned to Burlington Telecom.

The suit was brought last year by former city councilors Fred Osier and Gene Shaver. Earlier this year, Superior Court Judge Helen Toor banned the city from dipping any further into the so-called "cash pool" to pay for Burlington Telecom's ongoing operations.

The pair wants BT to repay the entire $17 million, along with their legal fees. If BT doesn't have enough cash, they want Leopold to be held personally liable for repayment, too.

The one paragraph ruling, signed by all five members of the Supreme Court, reads:

"Defendant Jonathon Leopold's motion to appeal from the trial court's denial of his motions to dismiss and for permission to appeal is denied in that the motion was untimely filed and, in any case, fails to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by denying permission to appeal."

The citizen lawsuit has been largely stalled while Leopold sought immunity, although the city and plaintiffs have been arguing recently over what documents BT should provide to the court. The city had agreed to provide regular financial updates to the court to ensure that it was complying with the edict to repay any and all city funds within 60 days, per BT's certificate of public good.

A recent outside financial review alleges BT has been in debt to taxpayers — a violation of its CPG — since September 2005.

Osier and Shaver are also seeking party status in the ongoing Vermont Service Board investigation into whether the city violated its CPG and how it can repair any fiscal damage. A hearing before the three-member PSB was held last week.

At the time, the plaintiff's attorney Norman Williams told the PSB that he had filed for party status back in July. PSB Chairman Jim Volz seemed surprised by Williams' request, and said they would double-check the files to make sure it was received.

One or more images has been removed from this article. For further information, contact
Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Tags: ,

More By This Author

About The Author

Shay Totten

Shay Totten

Shay Totten wrote "Fair Game," a weekly political column, from April 2008-December 2011.

Comments (15)

Showing 1-10 of 15


Comments are closed.

Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.

While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2022 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401

Advertising Policy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Help
Website powered by Foundation