UPDATE: Colchester Voters Resoundingly Reject Camp Holy Cross Purchase | News | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Seven Days needs your financial support!

UPDATE: Colchester Voters Resoundingly Reject Camp Holy Cross Purchase 

It's official: Voters sent a clear and unequivocal message to the Colchester selectboard today, voting to reject the $4.5 million purchase of the former Camp Holy Cross property on Malletts Bay.

The results of Tuesday's special election, announced shortly after 8 p.m., revealed that "no" votes outnumbered "yes" votes by a more than 2-to-1 margin. Out of 3069 votes cast, 2110 gave a thumbs down to proposed purchase of the 27-acre parcel, while only 959 approved of the deal.

Sam Conant, a member of the Camp Holy Cross Vision Committee, a citizens' advisory body hurriedly pulled together in late August to examine possible uses, liabilities and other restrictions on the property, expressed regret that fewer than 5000 residents turned out for Tuesday's special election. Nevertheless, Conant, an outspoken supporter of the purchase, thanked all the residents who showed up to the various open houses held at the property, as well as his fellow panel members, many of whom were against the deal.

Tuesday's vote was the second opportunity for Colchester residents to weigh in on the deal. In March 2010, voters authorized the selectboard to enter into preliminary negotiations with the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington. The diocese is selling off the lakefront real estate to help pay its settlements to victims of its priest sex-abuse cases in Vermont. (For background, click here.)

However, numerous questions arose in recent weeks about the fiscal wisdom of the proposed $4.5 million bond issuance, which would have put voters on the hook for something closer to $6.9 million over 20 years. And, unlike a mortgage, the town wouldn't have had the luxury to pay off its debt early.

The fur really began flying in this otherwise politically sleepy town over the last two weeks when the volunteer Colchester Community and Economic Development Advisory Council (CEDAC) formally recommended that citizens vote against purchase.

In emails and postings on Front Porch Forum, CEDAC Chair James Ehlers and Vice Chair Dave Usher called the potential Holy Cross purchase "fiscally imprudent" and the current time frame for evaluating it "untenable given the scope of the commitment at hand." In response, Town Manager Al Voegele demanded that Ehlers and Usher resign.

In the eyes of many Colchester voters, Tuesday's vote was the final opportunity for the public to score a parcel of prime lakefront real estate at a greatly reduced price for future generations. However, for many opponents of the deal, today's vote reflected enormous dissatisfaction with the way the entire purchase process was handled. Specifically, the selectboard opted to not invest in an independent feasibility study of the property well in advance of the vote, choosing instead to spend $15,000 on a Burlington PR firm to get the vote out.

Based on today's disappointing turnout, that money doesn't appear to have been well spent, either.

One or more images has been removed from this article. For further information, contact web@sevendaysvt.com.
Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Tags: ,

More By This Author

About The Author

Ken Picard

Ken Picard

Bio:
Ken Picard has been a Seven Days staff writer since 2002. He has won numerous awards for his work, including the Vermont Press Association's 2005 Mavis Doyle award, a general excellence prize for reporters.

Comments


Comments are closed.

Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.

While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative
newsletters:

All content © 2020 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401  |  Contact Us
Website powered by Foundation