Vermont Yankee - and Its Opponents - Turn Up the Heat at the Statehouse | Environment | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Seven Days needs your financial support!

Vermont Yankee - and Its Opponents - Turn Up the Heat at the Statehouse 

Local Matters

Published February 17, 2010 at 8:01 a.m.


Shutting down Vermont Yankee may or may not spell economic doom for the state, depending on whom you believe, but one profession seems to be thriving amid the rancor and uncertainty: lobbying.

The list of companies shelling out large sums of money for paid lobbyists reads like a Who’s Who of the heated battle over the nuclear plant’s future.

The biggest spender in the second half of 2009 was Vermont Public Interest Research Group, the loudest antinuke voice in the state. VPIRG spent $142,926 for lobbying activities between August and December, the most recent period for which numbers are available. Coming in at number two was Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, the reactor’s corporate owner, which spent $105,447.

All of those expenditures occurred before the latest round of deceptions and radioactive leaks propelled the nuke plant’s owners into damage-control mode. Entergy has since hired new lobbyists and spent thousands on television and newspaper ads in an effort to repair its image.

Together, the two sides shelled out almost $250,000 on lobbying, advertising and organizing during the run-up to the 2010 legislative session, when lawmakers could vote on extending Yankee’s license for another 20 years. That hefty sum is greater than the contributions of the next four biggest spenders combined.

But the supporting actors in the Vermont Yankee drama anted up, too. Vermont Energy Partnership, a business consortium bankrolled by Entergy and other companies, was the seventh biggest spender on lobbying, with $24,000 in salaries and $22,739 in paid advertising.

On the antinuke side, Vermont Citizens Action Network paid $32,500 to lobbyist Bob Stannard to advocate against relicensing.

Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin (D-Windham) characterizes the pro-nuclear campaign as the most “organized and well-funded” lobbying effort in Vermont’s history.

“Every lobbyist in the building is working for them,” Shumlin says of Entergy. “This is being run like a political campaign.”

Shumlin’s remark might be hyperbole, but the team of lobbyists working for Entergy is growing, and the stakes for the company, and for Vermont, are high. Not only are 650 well-paying plant jobs on the line, but Entergy’s profits are, too.

Entergy recently reshuffled its lobbying team following revelations that top officials lied under oath to regulators about plant infrastructure. Entergy already had nine registered lobbyists on the payroll before the recent shake-up brought several fresh faces into the mix.

Entergy’s lobbying expenditures last summer and fall break down to $56,537 on salaries, $47,075 on advertising and $1835 on “other” expenses. Meanwhile, VPIRG paid $80,324 for lobbyist salaries, $2823 for telemarketing and $59,779 for support staff, overhead and computers.

VPIRG executive director Paul Burns says the numbers are deceiving.

Only one VPIRG lobbyist, James Moore, works full-time on Vermont Yankee. Seven others work on unrelated environmental and good government issues. Half of VPIRG’s $142,926 lobbying largesse was used to work against Vermont Yankee; the rest went to other campaigns.

Burns says the official disclosures don’t include lobbyists who advocate for Vermont Yankee without collecting a paycheck from Entergy.

“Most lobbying firms are spending at least a little bit of time on the relicensing of Vermont Yankee,” Burns says. “That’s a lot of firepower on their side.”

The Vermont Yankee Issue

Another day, another tritium-leak story. Vermont Yankee has dominated the news in recent months, owing to a perfect storm of factors: physical problems at the aging plant; a relicensing deadline; and the Vermont legislature’s unique opportunity to vote on the future of the state’s only nuclear facility.

Why should you care? Because every nuke plant, handled improperly, is a potential Chernobyl. Handled properly, nuke plants are touted as low-cost, low-carbon sources of energy.

Vermont Yankee’s affordable power prices, coupled with political inertia, have slowed the development of local renewable power sources. The economic recession has eroded Yankee’s decommissioning fund — the money VY’s parent company, Louisiana-based Entergy, is required to set aside to pay for the plant’s eventual dismantling. As if that weren’t enough to worry about, Entergy wants to create a spin-off company that would end up owning Yankee. Critics allege it would allow the nuke facility to declare bankruptcy, leaving Vermonters with the bill to clean up VY.

This week’s Vermont Yankee package aims to bring readers up to speed on a complicated issue that can’t be reduced to “Nuclear Energy for Dummies” — although Lauren Ober does explain the basic science in her story about Yankee’s hometown of Vernon. Juxtaposed profiles of federal whistleblower Arnie Gundersen and his arch nemesis, public service commissioner David O’Brien, reveal a tense behind-the-scenes conflict that has shaped state policy on Vermont Yankee for years.

In an expanded “Local Matters,” Shay Totten investigates the legal ramifications of shutting down Yankee and asks experts to predict what will power a post-nuke Vermont. Ken Picard examines the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s dual role of regulator and industry promoter. Andy Bromage looks at Entergy’s ongoing — and expensive — lobbying efforts.

Since nuclear contamination doesn’t recognize state borders, Vermont’s problem is spilling over into New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Totten gives a voice to Yankee’s downstream neighbors. They’d like to have a say in this, too.

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

More By This Author

About The Author

Andy Bromage

Andy Bromage

Andy Bromage was a Seven Days staff writer from 2009-2012, and the news editor from 2012-2013.


Comments are closed.

Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.

While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.

Latest in Environment

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2022 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401

Advertising Policy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Help
Website powered by Foundation