WTF Update: Gubernatorial Spouses Don't Want Gov's Mansion | News | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

Seven Days needs your financial support!

WTF Update: Gubernatorial Spouses Don't Want Gov's Mansion 

Published January 24, 2011 at 2:15 p.m.

Last week, I wrote a piece for our WTF column about why Vermont doesn't have a governor's mansion. If you read the story, you'll know that we're one of only five states in the nation that does not house our supreme leaders in laps of luxury. Instead, we ask them to rent rickety tenement squats in Barre. Kidding. 

The main reason for the lack of a gov manse, according to state curator David Schutz, is the fact that, as a state, we're cheap as hell (I'm paraphrasing). Or rather, we don't need fancy things. We're happy with a tumbledown barn, one flannel shirt and a half a pair of socks. A governor's mansion might seem ostentatious. And no Vermont gov wants to give off that vibe.

But, says Arthur Kunin, ex-husband of former governor Madeleine Kunin, there's one other important reason why we don't have gube digs. Mr. Kunin called to say that when he was the state's first First Man (not First Dude, FYI Todd Palin), he had a conversation with Barbara Snelling, wife of former governor Richard Snelling, about why there was no official residence. 

Snelling told him that over the years, many people had offered up stately homes around Montpelier for use as a governor's mansion. And every time a property was pitched, the first wives lobbied against them. They didn't want to have to manage such a building, nor did they want lawmakers and staffers in their house all the time. Plus, they didn't want to have to take their kids out of their home schools. The spouses, Kunin said, viewed the possibility of an official residence as a burden rather than a perk.

Over the years, Kunin recalled, he posed the question of whether Vermont should have a governor's mansion to other First Spouses, including Hillary Clinton and Kitty Dukakis, and all of them had the same response — don't do it. Apparently, they told him, it's not worth the hassle. It's not your own house and when things break, you have to wait for someone from the state's building crew to get around to fixing it.  Plus, it becomes one more thing to manage. 

So it's not just that we're cheap; it's that we're sensible. And we're not swayed by glittery baubles dangled in front of our faces. Well, some of us, anyway.


One or more images has been removed from this article. For further information, contact
Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Tags: ,

More By This Author

About The Author

Lauren Ober

Lauren Ober

Lauren Ober was a Seven Days staff writer from 2009-2011.


Showing 1-1 of 1


Comments are closed.

Since 2014, Seven Days has allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we’ve appreciated the suggestions and insights, the time has come to shut them down — at least temporarily.

While we champion free speech, facts are a matter of life and death during the coronavirus pandemic, and right now Seven Days is prioritizing the production of responsible journalism over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor. Or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2022 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401

Advertising Policy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Help
Website powered by Foundation