By 7 p.m. Wednesday, a crowd started to stream into the Vermont House chamber for a Farmers Night performance — only to find legislators still filling the seats.
Representatives remained mired in a nearly six-hour debate about recounting an election race, even though virtually no one expects the results to change, or offered solid proof of vote-counting error.
“The results could be the same. The results could be different. We don’t know,” argued Rep. Maida Townsend (D-South Burlington), chair of the House Government Operations Committee.
There were plenty of allegations to go around, however, as legislators accused each other of plotting election fraud and of partisan posturing.
When it was over, the House voted 76-59 along party lines to initiate a recount in the Orange County race.
House Speaker Mitzi Johnson (D-South Hero) defended the lengthy debate. “It’s worth the investment of our time to make sure there is integrity to our election process,” she said afterward.
Republicans disagreed, arguing that the recount itself compromises the integrity of the election process.
“I’m very disappointed that the majority, by adopting this resolution, has failed
to reject what is a blatantly prejudiced effort to challenge the legitimacy of a
democratically elected official, and the competence of the voters, town clerks
and judiciary involved in the Orange-1 district election and recount,” House Minority Leader Don Turner (R-Milton) said on the floor.
Town clerks around Vermont were equally miffed. “We firmly believe this is undermining the integrity of all town and city clerks as well as the justices of the peace, that are elected to serve as members of the Board of Civil Authority,” the Vermont Municipal Clerks’ and Treasurers’ Association said in a statement.
The recount ruckus revolves around a House race won by Republican Bob Frenier of Chelsea. He ousted longtime Progressive incumbent Susan Hatch Davis of Washington.
Frenier’s margin of victory went from eight votes on election night to six after a recount, then bumped back to seven votes after a judge certified the results. He was sworn in to the House in January.
Hatch Davis turned to the legislature for another recount, alleging there were inconsistencies in the way the district’s six towns counted votes.
Though the House Government Operations Committee found no solid evidence of miscounted votes, the Democratic majority argued that a recount would reassure voters that electronic tabulators work properly. Wednesday’s vote grants Hatch Davis an as yet unscheduled recount to be overseen by legislators themselves.
“It’s good. Good news,” Hatch Davis said as she left the Statehouse following the vote.
“It’s an insult,” said Frenier, who abstained from the vote on his own seat. “We’re talking about seven votes. The chances of overturning that are zilch.”
Republicans accused Democrats of plotting to manipulate the results in Hatch Davis’ favor. “That’s our concern,” Turner said at a press conference to denounce the vote.
Democrats insisted that Hatch Davis raised enough questions about the vote-counting process, even though they had no evidence of election improprieties.
Johnson said Democrats have no ulterior motive. “It sounds like there’s a bit of paranoia about what might happen,” Johnson said after the vote. “We want to make sure it’s the will of the voters.”
As she spoke, lawmakers yielded their House seats to the evening’s audience. The day’s long session wrapped just in time for poet/performer David Mills to begin his 7:30 p.m. show honoring Martin Luther King Jr. Mills was scheduled to perform King’s “I Have a Dream” speech.
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Why do dogs lick themselves ? Because they can !
It’s fashionable of those on the left to angrily denounce Republican efforts to manipulate the vote across the nation. And it’s true the right does so because they have the power to do so . Here in Vermont the shoe is on the other foot . I guess the lesson is that politics is a nasty business . Neither side is on the side of the gods . They both play dirty because they can and because we let them !
How were the arguments that Hatch Davis made to the Legislature different than the ones she made to the court that certified the election for her opponent? Is the Legislature just second-guessing the judiciary’s decision making when it comes to recounts? Separation of powers is kind of a quaint concept in the Trump era, but I would hope we still care about it in Vermont.
This was an extremely ill-considered action by the legislature that makes for a terrible precedent with many, many potential negative implications, not the least of which is an increase in cynicism about our election system. I’m deeply disappointed in the majority.
Well, this is nothing short of scandalous in “clean government” Vermont. This is a shameful act of partisanship by the Left-controlled legislature, which wants to see if they can get another Left vote at the expense of a Republican member whose valid election has already been certified by a recount, by the court system, and by the Secretary of State. In addition, this is a shameful waste of time by a Legislature that says it “doesn’t have time” to consider the Governor’s education restructuring plan. Shame on Mitzi Johnson for allowing this to happen. All she had to do was say “No” and this would be over already. Way to start your Speakership off on the wrong foot.
After the recounts and a Judge certifying the results, there is still an integrity issue? I think the integrity issue is within the new Speaker’s basically slapping all town clerks in the face saying the legislature knows more than they do and can count better. So what happens if the same result ( which I expect) occurs? Will the cry baby try going to court again to get her way? I find this a complete waste of time and money by the legislature, something they have become very good at doing since it is not their money.