The Burlington City Council is scheduled Monday to discuss, and vote on, a long-awaited blueprint for the future of city streets, sidewalks, paths and intersections.
Lead sponsor Max Tracy (P-Ward 2) called the 200-page document “a world class vision for walking and biking.” At the Wards 2 and 3 Neighborhood Planning Assembly last Thursday, he urged residents to come to Monday’s meeting to voice their support. “I’m really, really excited about this,” he said.
PlanBTV Walk Bike is part of a Queen City effort to achieve a “Gold Level” designation as a bike-friendly municipality, which requires that 65 percent of its roads have bike lanes. Currently, 12 percent of Burlington streets — 11.9 miles — have bike lanes.
The plan recommends pilot bike lanes on Winooski Avenue, as well as Main Street, Pine Street and Shelburne Road. Going forward, it also calls for adopting safety ordinances, implementing bike share programs, and improving intersections and signage. According to the document, two-thirds of 540 survey respondents said that they “don’t bike in Burlington because they don’t feel safe.”
If adopted, the plan would nearly double the city’s expenditures on sidewalk and biking infrastructure — a jump from the current $1.5 million up to $2.5 million. The additional costs would be covered by a capital bond voters approved in March.
Monday’s vote on the master plan will come after the city spent two years asking questions of community members, conducting studies and working with organizations to develop the plan, said Nicole Losch, who helped oversee the project for the Department of Public Works. Work would begin as early as this summer, focusing on safety at intersections, and a “quick-build” approach, using adjustable materials for experimental, temporary bike lanes, Losch said.
For some, the plan poses concerns. It’ll limit parking, said Councilor Dave Hartnett (D-North District). Despite an increase in cyclists and alternative transportation, “most people get from A to B by cars,” he added. “My concern is that it would congest traffic in our downtown area so that it’ll keep people from coming downtown.”
Kurt Wright (R-Ward 4) said he’d be hesitant to vote “yes” without more time to review the lengthy document. “There are a lot of ramifications to the plan,” he said.
The master plan does not include a mandate for the controversial pilot bike lane program on North Avenue, which sparked debate last year. The city reduced the roadway from four lanes to three and added a bike lane on either side as a way to improve safety. Some residents in the New North End have protested the changes.
The city has hired the Castleton Polling Institute to survey New North End residents about their use of North Avenue, and to determine if they support the three-lane roadway with the bike lanes — or if they prefer a return to four lanes.
The surveys will go out in May, said Hartnett, and residents will have 30 days to respond in written form, by phone or online. The master plan, meanwhile, labels the road a “crucial corridor,” pointed out Tracy.
The city council will consider all the resident feedback and vote in July on keeping — or removing — the bike lanes, Hartnett said.
If the council approves the master plan on Monday, it would still need to be approved by the Planning Commission and incorporated into the 10-year capital plan. And although the council’s vote will move the plan forward, each of the individual recommendations would need to be explored and approved individually, said Chapin Spencer, head of the Department of Public Works.
It’s not a mandate, but a starting point for an ongoing discussion, Spencer said. “It sets a direction for a city to improve walking and biking,” he said.
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Burlington needs a comprehensive plan for all vehicles. Adding bike lanes to busy streets is not a solution. Driving a car around Burlington is already a disaster. There are plenty of adjacent streets that could be utilized for developing cycling routes that would make much more sense. I enjoy riding my bike all over the city most of the year, but sometimes I need to drive my car. A well planned bike route accommodates everyone. Just because I’m on a bike doesn’t give me special rights to the road. Yes we do need to add more bike lanes, but let’s be sensible about it.
If you want to understand why the mayor would spend $2.5 million of your hard-earned tax money to paint some bike lanes, you need to understand what his ilk – and the city councilors – do to retain their cushy jobs.
It’s called keeping the liberal welfare class satiated.
Elections in Burlington are about keeping the city the way Bernie Sanders left it – in a mess.
The way these clowns keep their offices is by following the Willie-Sutton method: Go where the votes are.
And where is that? In the liberal enclaves of Burlington.
My primary mode of transportation is my bike – I don’t have a car. Yet I pay taxes for the road all the same (and I’m not shitting out the carbon pollution that is slowly destroying our planet in excessive amounts). Bikers have just as much of a right to the road as any other vehicle.
To all the folks who are opposed to bike lanes: sorry that protecting our safety on bikes makes you sit in traffic a little longer – pass the time by playing yourself a tune on the world’s smallest violin.
Bikes and cars have no business sharing the same pavement. It’s inherently dangerous. Instead of copying everyone else’s terrible ideas, put some of that underutilized property to good use, like power easements and the circ highway right of way that will never be, and create a dedicated green belt biking infrastructure away from heavy traffic. The higher the percentage of bike lanes there are per road, the more biker hostile a city is regardless of what any ridiculous “gold level” designation might imply.
Have Sinex build a monorail. North Haverbrook has one. I’m sure Weinberger can get him the necessary permits and rewriting of the city plan.