During a traffic stop last summer, a Franklin County sheriff’s deputy quickly discovered the driver of a green Dodge truck couldn’t speak English. Through a translator, the deputy also learned that the man didn’t have a Vermont driver’s license. He radioed for backup from a “Romeo unit.”
Within 10 minutes, U.S. Border Patrol agents were standing next to the green truck.
The deputy held up a document for the feds to see.
“This is all I have for ID on him,” the deputy said.
“Yeah, he’s wet,” said a grinning Border Patrol agent, apparently employing a racial epithet.
Advocates say the incident, which was captured on the body cameras of two Franklin County sheriff’s deputies, illustrates a major problem in Vermont: Local cops are reporting undocumented immigrants to federal authorities, even though immigration law isn’t in their purview.
The collaboration runs afoul of the state’s “model” Fair and Impartial Policing policy. But agencies around the state have adopted differing versions of that policy, which consists of both mandatory and optional rules. Franklin County Sheriff Robert W. Norris did not respond to inquiries Friday about his department’s policy.
Jay Diaz, a staff attorney for the Vermont chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, said the footage shows “how quickly a stop of someone with brown skin from a different country — how quickly federal immigration authorities are brought into that situation without any real need to do so.”
The ACLU and the Burlington-based advocacy group Migrant Justice obtained the body cam footage through a public records request. The driver in the video, Luis Cordova Ordaz, was in the truck with his father, according to Will Lambek of Migrant Justice, and the traffic stop landed both of them in federal custody.
“He’s still being detained with immigration detention, and he’s likely being deported in the next week or two,” Lambek said of Ordaz.
In the footage, U.S. Border Patrol agents can be heard referring to the driver as “wet” and talking about whether a Spanish-speaking woman on the scene was “a wet.” Lambek said the agents were abbreviating the epithet “wetback,” which has been used to describe undocumented immigrants from Latin America.
“Whether he’s using a shortened racial slur or the full slur, it’s absolutely unconscionable and it’s a window into the dehumanization in immigration enforcement,” Lambek said.
Stephanie Malin, a spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, would not directly address the use of the term. “We are looking into the matter although we cannot discuss the details of it at this time,” Malin said in a written statement. “U.S. Border Patrol agents strive to treat all individuals they encounter with dignity and respect and will enforce the nation’s laws while preserving the civil rights and civil liberties of all people with whom they interact.”
Lambek and other advocates said that the traffic stop is part of a larger trend.
“This window into the reality of rampant collaboration between Vermont law enforcement and [President Donald] Trump’s deportation agents demonstrates the need for why now, more than ever, we need to have strong policy to protect the rights of immigrant Vermonters and protect the principle of equal treatment under the law,” Lambek said.
The ACLU and Migrant Justice are trying to bring public attention to the issue because they say the state is on the verge of weakening protections for immigrants.
A law passed earlier this year requires Vermont’s Criminal Justice Training Council to “update” the state’s Fair and Impartial Policing Policy, which was approved in 2016, “to provide one cohesive model policy for law enforcement” around the state to adopt.
Rep. Martin LaLonde (D-South Burlington), the lead sponsor of the legislation, said the idea was to create a single, mandatory policy for all police in the state. LaLonde’s legislation requires officials to coordinate with Migrant Justice as they update the policy, but Lambek said law enforcement used the update as an opportunity to roll back protections that were in the previous version of the policy.
“This goes well beyond a simple update,” said Lambek. “This is proposing sweeping cuts to the policy.”
Officials at the Criminal Justice Training Council did not respond to an interview request Friday. Diaz, the ACLU attorney, said there’s no question that the previous policy was stronger than the one officials are considering now.
“We don’t believe that the legislature envisioned a watering-down of the protections … That’s what’s happened, unfortunately, in some areas,” Diaz said. “There have been many changes, some for the better, some for the worse.”
The legislature separately passed a bill this year that prohibits formal agreements under which federal immigration authorities deputize local police to enforce civil immigration law.
Lambek and Diaz said law enforcement officials are refusing to adopt policies that prohibit local law enforcement from collaborating with federal immigration authorities, as Franklin County deputies did during the August 29 traffic stop.
Lambek said the proposed changes are driven by the Trump administration’s letters to local jurisdictions threatening to cut off federal funding to “sanctuary cities” and communities with similar policies.
“One word: Trump,” Lambek said. “That’s the driving force behind these changes. It’s the state of Vermont bending over backwards in order to accommodate itself to the empty threats from the Trump administration.”
The Criminal Justice Training Council is expected to vote on the new model policy at a meeting December 12 in Pittsford.
See the full, unedited bodycam video here.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Let’s hope the Vermont law enforcement agencies keep up the good work and cooperate with the ice.
Illegal Aliens are NOT ‘immigrants’ as this article and those quoted in it seem to infer and it’s not fair to those who have come here legally to conflate the meaning of the word as such.
Protecting criminals you mean? They aren’t legal here, hence they broke laws, hence they are criminals. Deport them all of they cant follow the laws of the land. Its not a matter of race or ethnicity, its a matter of legality.
Undocumented immigrants are supporting key industries in Vermont, such as the dairy industry. They are here to follow the American dream of a better future for themselves and their families. They mean noone harm, they just want to work hard, and do better than they had the opportunity to do so in their own country. State and local law enforcement agencies are supposed to follow state and local laws. It’s the primary principle of federalism. If local law enforcement isn’t following state law, then they are breaking the law. Plain and simple. Our federal immigration policy is a failure. I’m proud of our state for taking steps to protect our fellow Vermonters, documented or not.
Seems to me the point of the article is that the law enforcement officer was classifying individual human beings in derogatory and prejudicial terms. It is unprofessional and a disgrace to the people the officer is sworn to protect and serve. I find that alone is cause for disciplinary action.
He broke the law, is a criminal and should be treated accordingly – like it or not, end of discussion.
Speaking for all of us hispanics, this officer should be relieved of his duties.
Is “wet” a racial slur when used in that context? It sounds like he was using in more as a way to say the person was undocumented rather than as a direct remark to the person.
These illegals are BREAKING the law. When you sneak across the border you become a criminal. Go to any other country and sneak in and see what happens to you…PRISON. . Most of the illegals send most of their money back to their home. so they are not helping our economy. Immigrants are people who come here, usually by boat, they apply for citizenship, they want to work. illegals are people who sneak in and most of the time live off the system, they don’t want to work. So unless they come here the right way, legally, they are criminals.
Keep up the good work guys, you are doing your job. To protect the citizens of the United States. I stand beside you.
Mr. Quintana – not sure how you can speak for all Hispanics – bit of a stretch don’t you think:)
Mr Hide behind a fake name – Your white privilege shines brightly through your words of ignorance. I do and will speak for my fellow people.
Thank you officers for doing your jobs and upholding the constitution and protecting legal citizens from those that come to this country and take advantage of our good nature. God bless the men and women in blue.
One thing I can say about Trump’s election is that is has emboldened people to get out and express dehumanizing comments about their fellow humans, just as Mr. Trump does. How many of these commenters claim to be Christians? Did Jesus use such terms when dealing with the poor and the criminals he associated with? No human being is illegal. That should be the first understanding. If they have been found guilty in a court of law, they are criminals. If they have been found by an appropriate adjudication to be here illegally, then they are undocumented, but not ILLEGAL. It is not illegal to be alive, no matter what some of these commenters seem to believe. It is possible to be hispanic and be a legal resident, indeed a citizen, of this country. Hate such as exhibited here has no place in a civilized society.
Such a slanted article 7 Days! Neither the ACLU nor Migrant Justice are unbiased, as they both certainly have a rabid leftist agenda. Especially in the case of Migrant Justice, they are not focused on protecting Vermonters or any U.S. citizens, unless of course you count the farmers who dont want to pay decent wages to Vermonters. The issue here is the rule of law and how most of these illegal aliens dont follow laws. The deputy had every reason to call USBP. He sees this activity on a daily basis. He had articuable facts based on no insurance, no drivers license, failure to yield, AND the subject spoke only Spanish. Hello! Probably not a US citizen…duh! I was amazed at his restraint in waiting so long to call.
Good catch by Vermont law enforcement. Driving a truck with ILLEGAL TAGS, no drivers license, cannot (or will not) communicate in English. Certainly sounds like sufficient probable cause to believe that these individuals were ILLEGAL ALLIENS to me. Deputy contacted the appropriate federal agency to deal with them. Sounds like a job well done to me.
When an individual takes an oath to enforce the law it means ALL laws not just selected ones. What if federal law enforcement refused to cooperate with state and local cops?
Deport these individuals ASAP. If they return let them serve 5 years in a federal prison before they are deported again.
Get to know some of the undocumented workers here in VT before saying nasty things about them. They are our neighbors and, They have a lot to offer to VT society if we would fully embrace them. Instead of criticizing them for not knowing English and not having their car requirements in order, reach out and help them live in a foreign country. Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. They are forced to come here due to very bad policies by our and their governments.
Illegal aliens don’t deserve respect. They are criminals. And anybody who is a legitimate migrant should learn English. Period. Deport. Deport. Deport.