Months before Gov. Phil Scott’s administration proposed partnering with a private prison corporation to build a 925-bed facility in northwestern Vermont, the governor and two cabinet officials met with industry lobbyists who could benefit from the plan.
Records obtained by Seven Days show that Scott met with representatives of CoreCivic, formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America, during a February 2017 trip to Washington, D.C. According to Scott spokesperson Rebecca Kelley, the 15-minute meeting included CoreCivic’s Ohio-based lobbyist, Dan Kaman, and the company’s Vermont lobbyist, Andrew MacLean.
“I don’t recall that there was any ask,” the governor said. “They just wanted to say hello and wanted to have a chance to meet and congratulate me on the election.”
Several months later, in July 2017, MacLean emailed the Vermont Department of Corrections to request a meeting with Commissioner Lisa Menard, according to separate records obtained by Seven Days. He wrote that CoreCivic had been “discussing different methods for financing the construction of human services infrastructure in Vermont.” MacLean, who works for the Montpelier firm MMR, wrote that he had already spoken about the issue with Menard’s boss, Secretary of Human Services Al Gobeille.
“As a result of that recent conversation with [Secretary] Gobeille, it was suggested that a meeting might be an efficient way for us to present ideas and thoughts about the best ways [for] the state to develop buildings and facilities to meet its needs,” MacLean wrote.
The request led to a September meeting in Waterbury that, according to the records, included Gobeille, Menard, MacLean, Kaman and two Tennessee-based CoreCivic executives, John Malloy and Tony Grande.
“CoreCivic is always interested in exploring ways we can provide solutions to the challenges states are facing, and we seek to maintain an ongoing dialogue with potential government partners to support that effort,” the company’s spokesman, Jonathan Burns, said in a written statement. “Our recent meetings with Vermont officials have been brief introductory visits.”
Last week, Gobeille sent the legislature a report outlining a “10-year vision” to build a new facility in Franklin County that would house hundreds of prisoners and mental health patients. The report pegged the price of such a complex at $141 to $165 million and suggested that the “most affordable model” would involve contracting with a private prison firm to build it and lease it back to the state.
“There are entities, both local building firms and national private prison corporations, who have approached the State in recent years and expressed an interest in working toward this end,” the report’s authors wrote.
According to Gobeille, the September event was just “a meet-and-greet” and did not include specific discussion of a prison-building partnership. He noted that his agency’s report had documented the private-sector interest.
“So we were very transparent that there’s been people lobbying,” Gobeille said. “But the way state contracting works, we can’t talk about anything we’re going to contract for ahead of time, so we did not talk with them about that.”
Scott’s discussion with CoreCivic lobbyists came during conferences hosted by the National Governors Association and the Republican Governors Association. Records show that his schedule also included a 15-minute meeting with Reynolds American, the nation’s second-largest tobacco company.
The governor said he did not know why or how the cigarette purveyor landed on his schedule.
“I was wondering why it was that I was meeting with them, but, again, it was just a congratulatory [meeting],” he said. “There was no ask.”
“Maybe they got the wrong Scott,” he joked, referring to Florida Gov. Rick Scott. “Who knows?”
During the Vermont governor’s 2016 campaign, CoreCivic gave him $1,000, while Reynolds American contributed $4,000.
Both companies have been major donors to the RGA, which spent more than $3 million on advertisements supporting Scott’s candidacy. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, CoreCivic donated at least $565,000 and Reynolds American at least $680,000 to the RGA during the 2016 election cycle.
“CoreCivic supports individuals and organizations of any political affiliation that are open to learning more about the value of public-private partnership solutions,” said Burns, the CoreCivic spokesman.
Scott said he had no qualms about taking money from either corporation, arguing that if he were to “start stipulating which ones” to accept contributions from, it would “appear that you’re doing it for a reason.” He said he was unconcerned that such companies might be seeking influence with him.
“No, because that doesn’t buy anything from my perspective — other than a cordial introduction and ‘Hello, how are you?'” he said. “But, again, there’s been no ask from any of these entities.”
Taylor Dobbs contributed reporting.





Well funded candidates like SCOTT, have to be reminded where their loyalties are— and unfortunately, it seems his loyalties are where the money is— NOT the People of Vermont— but the corporations who pay to have influence in Vermont’s Governor’s office. Give me a candidate like James Ehlers. Ehlers isn’t corporately funded, and has his priorities & loyalties in check. Vermonters are tired of Scott taking money with one hand, and waving off Vermonters with the other.
#BeTheChange2018 #Transparency #EhlersForGovVT! #FreedomAndUnity
Scott’s priorities: more beds for prisoners than homeless.
Why?
There is no money in housing the homeless.
As a taxpayer who is damn tired of being fleeced by Vermon’ts elected officials, I am all ears to learn more about “…a ’10-year vision’ to build a new facility in Franklin County that would house hundreds of prisoners and mental health patients”. One option for making it so might be contained within the report suggesting “that the ‘most affordable model’ may well point to “contracting with a private prison firm to build it and lease it back to the state.” I think our state’s abysmal track record on many fronts should be incentive enough to pursue private management options. As for meeting with lobbyists, so what?
It takes all but 5 seconds on a search about Corecivics to realize that they have a terrible track record as a private for profit prison, do we not watch the news anymore in this state? When has the privitization of almost any industry resulted for the good of a community? Lets not let outside interests dictate what happens in our own state.
Corecivics track record is so bad there are counter efforts in other states to stop them like http://appletonlease.org in Minnesota who proclaims: CORECIVIC FACILITIES HAVE BEEN PLAGUED WITH VIOLENCE, SEXUAL ASSAULT AND MEDICAL NEGLECT – PUTTING INMATES, PRISON STAFF AND OUR COMMUNITIES IN DANGER. Citing multiple instances of sexual misconduct between staff and inmates, violent unchecked outbreaks and behavior, neglect, poor wages, etc.
The mere fact that Scoot is having any discussion with this disgusting group and willingly took money from them speaks more to his character than the content of their recent conversation.
BTW, Scott yeah you dont have to stipulate on whos lobby money you are taking, when faced with a moral choice on whether to take money from one greedy lobbyist over the other, did it ever occur to you that maybe the best choice was to not accept either?
Vermont State Government has, traditionally, been among the most straightforward and honest in the United States but that does not exempt us from being ever vigilant about corruption from creeping in, or from forever being on guard against evil and self-interested organizations putting their wants ahead of the needs of the Vermont People. This prison plan stinks of corruption. If we build it we must fill it, and why is Vermont considering also building 175 cells for the Feds? Possibly the most Anti-Vermont policy ever floated by any administration in our history.
For profit prisons are a disaster to communities. Trading souls on the stock market is a sin.
Is it just taking a bribe for core civic to get our inmates to mississippi