Samuel de Champlain survived more than 20 voyages on the rough seas between Europe and North America 400 years ago. He canoed to the Vermont lake that now bears his name and helped his Algonquin allies defeat their Iroquois enemies by shooting their stunned chiefs dead with the first gun they had ever seen.
Now the legacy of the celebrated explorer, who once pulled an arrow from his own neck and lived to write the tale, is facing a new threat at one of his many local namesakes: Champlain College.
Some student leaders at the private Burlington school want a larger-than-life bronze sculpture of the Frenchman gazing at Lake Champlain to be removed from a busy campus courtyard. Despite his historical alliance with tribes including the local Abenaki, de Champlain was still one of many colonizers who imposed their own values and suppressed indigenous groups, the critics say.
“They created a new society, but through that they erased the history of many people who lived before them,” said Jayy Covert, a 20-year-old junior and the Champlain Student Government Association director of diversity and engagement.
Covert introduced a resolution in September that calls for turning the 10-year-old sculpture over to an unspecified local museum. The resolution labels de Champlain a colonizer and recognizes the “pain inflicted” on indigenous people by placing the statue on campus. The student government will host an open meeting on Wednesday, November 6, to discuss the proposal, which has generated hot debate on social media and in classrooms.
The meeting runs from 6 to 8 p.m. in — where else? — the Champlain Room.
Last week, students streamed past the depiction of a young de Champlain, shirtless and with long hair, crouching on a tall block of Québec granite. The striking sculpture of the nearly naked, motionless man gazing west through a spyglass evokes a distant past.
But exactly what past? Covert told Seven Days that one of the many problems with the artwork is that the solitary figure of de Champlain reinforces a false narrative: namely that he “discovered” the lake, when in fact Native people had been living along its shores for centuries and, according to de Champlain’s own written account, led him there.
Critics have leveled similar complaints about the “Everyone Loves a Parade!” mural in downtown Burlington, which also features de Champlain.
On campus, Covert wouldn’t stop with the statue’s removal. The student thinks the name of the college itself should change but has made no resolution to propose that and figures it would be a multiyear effort.
Meanwhile, the student government has not voted on the sculpture resolution. It’s unclear whether approval would influence college administrators or trustees.
Interim college president Laurie Quinn declined to comment, and said through college spokesperson Leandre Waldo that she would wait until she had heard directly from students at the meeting. “We’d like to understand the student perspective,” Waldo said.
It was former Champlain president David Finney who shepherded and approved the statue, sculpted by one of Vermont’s best-known artists. That’s Jim Sardonis, the Randolph man who created “Reverence,” the landmark sculpture informally known as Whale Tails that can be seen from Interstate 89 in South Burlington; a slightly different version sits at Exit 4 in Randolph.
A college trustee who has since died funded the de Champlain piece, which went up in 2009 amid statewide celebrations of the quadricentennial of the explorer’s arrival on the lake in 1609.
Most of those celebrations presented a glowing portrayal of the man known as the father of New France, who lived from roughly 1567 to 1635 and whose name is plastered all over the Champlain Valley region. In 1958 the school, initially founded as Burlington Collegiate Institute and Commercial College, became Champlain College.
Some students, including members of the Champlain College Republican Club, view the school’s namesake as a hero and want the artwork to stay put.
“Those who are demanding the removal of the statue are not well informed on the history of Samuel de Champlain and the Abenaki people,” Nicholas Chace, a 20-year-old sophomore and club president, wrote in an email to Seven Days. “The demand … is based on a mistaken belief that Samuel de Champlain represents white colonialism and the atrocities committed against Native American tribes by early American settlers. While in actuality he was an ally of the Native American people that he met.”
The Republican Club has acted as something of a provocateur on campus. Last month, members at a table in the student center hung a poster that said, “There are only 2 genders. Change my mind.” About 20 people complained, and the campus bias response coordinator issued a statement in support of gender diversity.
Covert, who identifies as nonbinary and genderqueer, has no Native American heritage but says being active on transgender issues has led to a broader sense of social justice. The de Champlain statue erases indigenous people, Covert said.
This is not the first student bid to remove the statue. A similar resolution came before the student government last year but stalled. The organization is also considering, but has not approved, a proposal to stop giving wooden spyglasses modeled after the one in the de Champlain sculpture to each graduating senior. The tradition began after the sculpture was installed.
Abenaki leaders including Don Stevens of Shelburne, himself a 1991 graduate of Champlain College, have followed the debate.
Stevens isn’t calling for the sculpture to be removed, but he wants art honoring the Abenaki to get similar prominence on the campus.
“Why wouldn’t we have an Abenaki statue that would be of equal value?” asked Stevens, the chief of the Nulhegan band of the Coosuc Abenaki nation. “You don’t always have to tear things down in order to build things up.”
De Champlain allied with the Abenaki. “We don’t really have that big of an issue with Champlain himself,” Stevens said. Still, the sculpture leaves Native Americans out of the story of the lake. “It was here, it was ours, and we actually worked with the French,” he said. “They helped us; we helped them.”
It was Stevens who wrote the application for a grant and helped create a new Western Abenaki exhibit that will open November 9 at the Burlington International Airport.
He also pushed officials at Champlain College’s neighbor, the University of Vermont, to formally apologize for the school’s role in funding and harboring the Vermont Eugenics Survey. Directed by UVM professor Henry Perkins from 1925 to 1936, the survey portrayed white Protestant Vermonters of English heritage as the state’s best “seed stock” and targeted Native Americans, French Canadians, people with disabilities and those with “dusky” skin for possible institutionalization.
UVM then-president Tom Sullivan apologized in June. Last fall, UVM trustees voted to remove former school president Guy Bailey’s name from the college library because he supported the eugenics survey.
That de-naming debate occurred amid a host of others around the country involving Confederate statues, high school mascots, geographical place names and federal holidays such as Columbus Day, which Vermont has officially renamed Indigenous Peoples’ Day.
While Columbus enslaved and oppressed Indians, de Champlain’s biographers portray him as a strategic friend to some Native Americans and as an enemy to their enemies.
Still, there is no doubt that de Champlain was, literally, a colonizer. He voyaged to North America to help France stake a claim in the New World, engage in the fur trade and beat other European powers to establish a faster trade route to Asia.
The mission also involved bringing Christianity to what Europeans considered a savage land. De Champlain wrote of that goal in the introduction to his book, The Works of Samuel de Champlain.
The tome includes descriptions of Native American tribes de Champlain met along the coasts of what are now New England and Canada, as well as the interior. De Champlain recounts how he befriended Indian tribes in what became Québec. They helped advance his goals to ward off British rivals and to chart potential trade routes. In exchange, he helped the natives fight enemy tribes, sell furs and purchase previously unavailable goods.
De Champlain’s writing includes a vivid description of the lake he named for himself in 1609 after traveling there to help an alliance that included Algonquins to battle the Iroquois.
“Continuing our course in this lake on the west side I saw, as I was observing the country, some very high mountains on the east side, with snow on the top of them,” de Champlain wrote, likely referring to what we now call the Green Mountains.
According to de Champlain’s account, the victory over the Iroquois was quick; they fled in shock after their chiefs were shot. De Champlain was unsparing in his descriptions of other violence, namely what the Algonquins did with their Iroquois captives.
They tortured one prisoner’s torso with firebrands. “Then they tore out his nails and put the fire on the ends of his fingers and on his privy member,” de Champlain wrote. “Afterward they flayed the top of his head and dripped on top of it a kind of gum all hot.” Disgusted, de Champlain asked if he could simply shoot the prisoner dead and end his misery, which his Native American comrades eventually allowed.
But, de Champlain wrote, “after he was dead they were not satisfied, for they opened his belly and threw his entrails into the lake.”
The book relates other such scenes of torture, as well as fighting between the French and Native tribes along the Eastern seacoast. That complicated history is not evident in the de Champlain sculpture.
Seven Days contacted the artist, Sardonis, last week to ask him about the proposal to remove his work.
“This is taking me by surprise,” Sardonis said. “I hadn’t heard anything about it.”
On first glance, the sculpture could almost be mistaken for a portrayal of a Native American. Sardonis said that was deliberate; he wanted to portray de Champlain in a way that reflected what the artist perceived as the explorer’s closeness to indigenous people.
“I did what I was commissioned to do,” Sardonis said. “And I was happy with what I did, and what I felt in some ways honored the Native people in that [de Champlain], I felt, had an affinity for the way that they lived and worked.”
He’s not keen on moving the sculpture.
“I hope it doesn’t happen,” he said. “I happen to like the piece, and I like where it is.”
Correction, November 7, 2019: A previous version of this story misstated the status of the proposal to stop giving spyglasses to graduates.
The original print version of this article was headlined “Big Colonizer on Campus | The college named after Samuel de Champlain debates keeping his statue”
This article appears in Nov 6-12, 2019.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
“They created a new society, but through that they erased the history of many people who lived before them,” said Jayy Covert, a 20-year-old junior and the Champlain Student Government Association director of diversity and engagement.
Such exquisite irony.
There is hope in the way people are questioning the colonizer narrative in that sculpture and in the parade mural on Burlington’s Church Street Marketplace. White supremacists, insecure about their unearned privilege, promote racism to prevent equally competent “others” from competing with them. It’s white fragility, and it’s nasty.
The Student Government Association director of diversity and engagement is doing his job. Once a person’s consciousness is raised to one form of domination by the normative culture, s/he/they see oppression and where it comes from more readily. Intersectionality compounds the harm, but all people who are discriminated against are stronger if they recognize their common ground.
Perpetuating the colonialist narrative devalues native culture and falsely elevates white European culture. Making heroes out of the colonialists is part of the racist narrative, and you see it in the parade mural, too. It is institutional racism, reinforced continually — in history, government, art, media — until it is internalized. But it is a false narrative, it is not sustainable, and many people are working to deconstruct it.
The politically correct of the peoples republic of Burlington Vermont are ready to do more editing of its history in order to make a point. What they fail to recognize is by pulling all of the loose strings that they deem politically incorrect, the tapestry becomes unrecognizable or falls apart.
We need to remember our mistakes and our shortcomings, and learn from them, and not repeat them.
And we cant do that by editing history.
I like the option of having a separate statue on campus representing an Abenaki. He can be holding up a handful of entrails that he’s about to fling into the lake.
If Jay and those like him aren’t crying “racism” or something similar, their group has no reason for existence. Burlington schools, UVM and every other lib school (damn near all of them), waste millions and millions of dollars employing these people. Although Jay? and the lot are students, I don’t even have to look to know that Champlain employs diversity “specialists”. They literally have no job without the cries of “racism”, so they cry loudly and the news outlets lap it up on cue. Their job descriptions require no product and there is no accountability as long as the racism narrative is perpetuated by the media and the loud talking libs. It’s an entire industry now that produces nothing but division, “racism inc.”
A big Thank You to the person who posted that hilarious parody of the rampant, ignorant *cancel culture* movement on today*s high school and college campuses. I love the way the poster employed indecipherable culture-babble phrases to point out the politically correct but meaningless nature of the movement. Phrases like:
*colonizer narrative*
*unearned privilege*
*others*
*white fragility*
*diversity and engagement*
*consciousness raising*
*domination by the normative culture*
*s/he/they*
*oppression*
*intersectionality*
*colonialist narrative*
*devaluing native culture*
*white European culture*
*racist narrative*
*institutional racism*
*false narrative*
*deconstruct*
The way the poster managed to work ALL of those hilarious phrases into three paragraphs was brilliant! *s/he/they* has a killer eye for satire! Hat*s off! Keep up the great work!
I would strongly urge the reading of David Hackett Fisher’s book “Champlain’s Dream”. An incredibly well research historical account of the man and settling of New France.
Coming out the religious wars in France and appalled at what he observed of how the Spanish treated natives in the territories they conquered, Champlain had a radically different vision. It included respect for native culture and having cultural exchange having young Frenchmen go and live in native villages and natives in return living in France. Much there to be admired given the times and circumstance.
I guess you’d have to come from a different generation & probably a different country, not to realize the irony, not to mention ignorance of;
“Some student leaders at the private Burlington school want a larger-than-life bronze sculpture of the Frenchman gazing at Lake Champlain to be removed ” — Immediately followed by; “de Champlain was still one of many colonizers ***who imposed their own values and suppressed indigenous groups****, the critics say.”
Expel these infantile ideologues from the school and send them back where ever they came from. They apparently don’t do anything except roaming the school looking for things to be offended by.
“You don’t always have to tear things down in order to build things up.” was the best line of the entire article.
So typical of the prevalent rhetoric coming from what I like to call the “Victim Studies” majors that inhabit the neo-Maoist “trigger happy” wing of progressive ideology that have been taking over academic thought for the last 10 years. Shaming is their raison d’etre, shutting out other viewpoints their modus vivendi.
It was over 400 YEARS AGO!! Washington had slaves, so will we now remove all statues of him? How about Jefferson, Madison, Franklin…many of the original signers? We should learn from history, not attempt to annihilate it just because it doesn’t happen to conform to present day mores and standards. Maybe he/she/zhe/it/them needs to study a bit more history in order to move on to more productive pursuits. This kind of ersatz protestation is a farce.
Have yall thought about including other people who worked on this project other than Jay? Maybe other peoples perspectives and other people who worked on it. Doesnt seem fair that one person gets the limelight while there could potentially be other people working on the project too.
Now, where does this “Jayy” person come from? Surely doesn’t sound like a Vermonter. Been here all my life and that’s a long time and never had a problem with the name Samuel de Champlain and I am part Native American. I bet you any student who votes to remove this statue is from another state and could care less about it. They are just followers. Why don’t they just do what they are supposed to do.. LEARN..They want to destroy a statue then go back to your own state and destroy things. Leave our history alone !!!
I am a student here at Champlain and find it hard to believe why people seek to see the “bad” in the statue. I think that it is beautiful, and has so many great connections to the core values of this school. De Champlain was constantly gazing into the future in search for new discoveries and opportunities. I pass by the statue every day and it motivates me to keep on searching towards my vast future of opportunities. Champlain College even hands out a replica of the spy glass De Champlain is perceived to be holding in the statue to every student at graduation. It makes me mad that people have to waste their time to search for the “bad” in this statue. It does not insult me and it never will. If you have a problem with it why did you attend “Champlain College” to begin with?
Better to remove the statues of Ira and Ethan, known Indian killers. from the state house. But Samuel’s relationship with Abenaki is not well explained here. Relationships of first europeans are very specific and individual. Portuguese fishing villages had been established along the coast of turtle island’s right foot before Champlain. I think the story of him “saving” the paddlers in his canoe is specious. Worse, it instantly increased the violence and bloodshed in the region and actually started a bigger rift between neighbors and paved the way for colonialism. The early relationship with French intelligence gatherers (him and the Jesuits and Sulpecians) is also complicated, the invaders met with Anishenabek clans who were at that time pacifists and welcoming to refugees. Champlain violated that philosophy by using his gun to kill, which altered the relationship between pacifist Anishenanek and Mohawk forever.
Quebec had dropped the ‘de Champlain’ myth marketing promo by the time Burlington was using de Champlain to hype the colonialist narrative locally: “Apart from a few dress-up recreations that have already been criticized for their inaccuracies, the dim ancestral memories from the Quebec of Champlain’s time have been deliberately forgotten in favour of a celebration that is more forward-looking and eager to please, more representative of the way a dynamic metropolis wants to be seen by the world in 2008.”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/natio…
Why Burlington clings to the colonialist narrative is found in our history of VT Commission on Country Life (progenitor of Vermont Life magazine), the eugenics survey and sterilization of those deemed ‘unfit’, kkk groups, and the matketing of Vermont as the whitest state which has been promoted for over 150 years.
Institutional white supremacy is deeply embedded in Vermont life today. Example, the ‘Only White Lives Matter’ parade mural of notables on Burlington’s Church Street Marketplace.
Oh, thank goodness! At first I thought our favorite satirist of political*correctness*run*amok was going to miss an opportunity on this thread to post yet another hilarious parody about some peoples* crazed racial obsession with a meaningless, little*seen wall painting in an alley! But she didnt!