Vermont Senate to Again Consider Ban on Corporate Campaign Cash | Off Message
Pin It

Monday, February 26, 2018

Vermont Senate to Again Consider Ban on Corporate Campaign Cash

Posted By on Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:19 PM

click to enlarge Vermont Public Interest Research Group executive director Paul Burns - PAUL HEINTZ
  • Paul Heintz
  • Vermont Public Interest Research Group executive director Paul Burns
Vermont senators have revived a long-stalled effort to limit corporate cash in state elections. Last week, the Senate Government Operations Committee advanced a bill that would prohibit corporations from donating directly to candidates, clearing the way for a vote before the full Senate this week.

“It’s a significant step to try to at least address the issue of corporations having direct influence over candidates,” said Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, which has long pushed for such a measure.

The federal government has prohibited corporations from contributing directly to candidates since 1907, and more than 20 states have enacted such bans. But Vermont politicians had been reluctant to follow suit. In 2013, the Vermont Senate voted to impose a ban, only to reverse its decision days later.

Since then, "I think there has been more and more concern about money in campaigns," said Senate Government Operations chair Jeanette White (D-Windham). To avoid confusion about the definition of a corporation, the bill would simply prohibit donations from anyone other than an individual, a state party or a political action committee.

No one is under the illusion that the legislation, S.120, would purge corporate cash from the political process. While corporations wouldn't be able to write checks directly to candidates, they could still indirectly make contributions through PACs.

Sen. Chris Pearson (P/D-Chittenden), a proponent of the bill, said it would at least prevent "double dipping" — the tactic of contributing the maximum amount as an individual, and then giving the maximum amount again, but through a business entity.

The 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision known as Citizens United, which ruled that corporations have a right to political speech, makes further restrictions on corporate contributions unlikely.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Got something to say? Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Pin It

Did you appreciate this story?

Show us your ❤️ by becoming a Seven Days Super Reader.

About The Author

Alicia Freese

Alicia Freese

Alicia Freese is a Seven Days staff writer.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.

More on Statehouse

Latest in Off Message

Keep up with us Seven Days a week!

Sign up for our fun and informative

All content © 2018 Da Capo Publishing, Inc. 255 So. Champlain St. Ste. 5, Burlington, VT 05401
Website powered by Foundation