There must be something in the air. Over at Candleblog, a couple of pals are engaged in a frisky debate about a proposed Blogger Code of Conduct. Murf from False 45th and I are having a back and forth about the validity of backing tracks in live performance. I’m not sure I’d call our exchange a debate – I have a feeling we’ll end up making nearly the same point.
But I wanted to put the question out there to the rest of you. When does the use of triggered accompaniment become sonic chicanery?
Here’s a helpful list of hipster-approved acts who engage in the practice (partial source: Wikipedia). Not that I’m trying to influence you or anything:
The Album Leaf
Death Cab for Cutie
The Go! Team
Mogwai
Ratatattat
And so on…. I’m sure you guys can come up with more. No diva-hop or club-tronica, please.


Wow. I’m sorry I missed out on this top shelf debate.To clarify, the problem I had was with Kaza’s comment about it being the one of the best shows in thirty years. I didn’t really rip Buckingham for using pre-recorded tracks except to suggest that any show using pre-recorded tracks would remove the show from being consider on of the best shows ever. It could have still been a swell show but to call it one of the best ever is silly.To clarify my feelings about pre-recorded tracks, I largely agree with Brad. I like live music because it’s a bit of a trapeze act without a net. Shit goes wrong sometimes. Using a pre-recorded track simply to ensure that the live performance sounds just like the album, is safe and boring. And just to show some consistentcy on this, I ripped The Go! Team when I saw them live and realized they were mixing in pre-recorded horn tracks.Lastly, I see a distinction between what Buckingham and The Go! Team seem to have done and bands/artists that use pre-recorded samples and mix them together live into unique creations each time.
It’s official! No one wins this argument!