To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Although Democratic Party has never particularly been known as the party of economics, the F-35 “jobs” argument has always been incomplete because there has never been a real economic study of its impacts. As mocked, somewhat painfully here, there have been PR-funded “jobs” arguments but never a study of net economic impact done by a real economist. Net economic impact looks at both positive and negative impacts. Like net profit, not just gross. In spring of 2013, former Democratic Party State Representative George Cross of Winooski introduced legislation to conduct such a study. His Democratic colleagues denied him, apparently under direction of Shap Smith and Shumlin. Same thing happened in Boise, Idaho. Professional PHD economist, Dr. Kevin Cahill, was forced to call out Boise for its sole focus on positive impact with zero analysis of negative impact.
https://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/f-35s-in…
OTOH, US Air Force did examine economic impact, both positive and negative, among other factors, such as public health and environment. After doing so, as was previously reported, Burlington was ranked dead last, behind guard base in Jacksonville, Florida; and McEntire Guard base in rural Richland County, South Carolina.
Democratic Party can make no claim to being party of economics; science; public health or environment. When it is actively ignoring US Air Force’s own Environmental Impact Statement on all of above factors. Also seems to be a pivot toward Democrats using buzz words like “diversity.” However, it has no claim here either since demographics most negatively impacted are Vermont’s most diverse population. Democrats vulnerable because they embody environmental racism. Not clear what Dems stand for at all.
Production value matches the quality of the satire. Thumbs down. The most impressive aspect of this is how hard he panders to the left, honesty amazing.