Burlington school superintendent Yaw Obeng announced Wednesday that he is reassigning the leaders of many of Burlington’s nine schools.
Budget pressures mandate prompt action to seek efficiencies and collaborations that will better serve students, according to the superintendent, who is in his first year on the job. He said he expected the shakeup could generate pushback from some parents, as well as calls to move more slowly. Parents initially seemed to react cautiously.
“When I look at the needs of our students I don’t want to wait,” Obeng said at a press conference announcing the changes. “I want to do it now.”
Obeng said the shifts will not cost the district more money. That’s even though at least one administrator, Edmunds Middle School principal Bonnie Johnson-Aten, will move to a newly created central office position to help principals and promote innovation.
“It’s either going to be cost-neutral or we’re going to save dollars,” Obeng said.
Due to retirements and resignations, it appears only eight Burlington teachers will be laid off, instead of some 24 that could have gotten the ax next year, Obeng said.
Not all the principals wanted to be reassigned. In one of the more controversial moves, Burlington High School principal Amy Mellencamp will leave her post after 17 years to become principal of C.P. Smith Elementary School July 1.
Mellencamp had butted heads with Obeng. She fought to maintain a broad array of offerings at the city’s sole public high school, including access to Advanced Placement courses that are popular with top students, in the face of budget pressure to reduce staff and offerings as enrollment declined.
Mellencamp told Seven Days Wednesday that she was surprised to be re-assigned. She plans to retire in June 2017 and wanted one more year at BHS. “I certainly let the superintendent know that that was my intention and I certainly advocated to stay here for one more year to finish out my service, but also to transition the new person,” Mellencamp said.
Last month, several hundred people attended a school board meeting to complain about redundant study halls, “dead time” in student schedules at BHS and lack of space in courses such as AP biology.
Some parents Wednesday immediately questioned Obeng’s decision to move Mellencamp.
“We kind of knew this was coming and we want to know why,” said Jeff Wick, a father of three. “It really leaves us wondering.”
Mellencamp said BHS has trimmed seven teachers in the past two years and that Obeng asked her in December to identify eight to 10 more teacher cuts. “Initially I was shocked and really couldn’t see how to do this,” Mellencamp said. She added: “I probably advocated too much for the high school and I think probably that may not have sat well with some people.”
Classes that will not be offered at BHS next year, according to Mellencamp: AP Spanish, Latin III and IV, Physics II and some remedial math courses.
Mellencamp said that while her heart is in BHS, she will throw herself into the job at Smith. “My intent all along was to have a graceful transition into retirement,” she said. “I think that is not going to happen now.”
C.P. Smith principal Thom Fleury, who will be reassigned as interim assistant principal at Edmunds Elementary, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Other shuffles: Burlington Technical Center director Tracy Racicot will become the high school principal on an interim basis, for at least the 2016-2017 school year.
Shelley Mathias, principal of Edmunds Elementary, which sits next to Edmunds Middle School on Main Street, will lead the two schools in a bid to increase collaboration and maximize use of space.
Dorinne Dorfman, an outside hire, will assume the vacant principal slot at Champlain Elementary School. The principals at J.J. Flynn, the Integrated Arts Academy at H.O. Wheeler and the Sustainability Academy at Lawrence Barnes will remain the same.
Chip Hart, a father of two, was surprised to see a new central office position created for Johnson-Aten given the current strain on financial resources in the district. He expressed hope that the loss of teachers at BHS “doesn’t affect student schedules and doesn’t affect the morale of teachers at the high school.”
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
This is appalling. Now Edmunds Elementary School will no longer have a dedicated principal, unlike all of the other elementary schools. Sends a real message about what they think of Edmunds students and parents. I guess they want anyone who can afford it to switch to Mater Christi and further the decline of Burlington School District. And this is coming from the Superintendent who (1) spent around $90,000 of taxpayer dollars for his game-the-system immigration visa that pretends he is a professor at UVM instead of superintendent; (2) lied to Burlington City Council about coming to live in Burlington and instead moved to South Burlington, and thereby is actively violating Burlington law; and (3) refuses to put his money where his mouth is and has instead enrolled his own children in South Burlington schools. Zero skin in the game and does not have to live with the result of his decisions.
Obeng needs to go immediately and should have to pay back all of the legal fees for his fraudulent visa.
With the carte blanche Obeng has it’s almost as if he is a developer promising to redevelop the city’s downtown.
I urge Burlington parents who are concerned about these changes to run for school board. This is now our school system and we can’t simply complain from the side lines or rely on others to run the system. We now must become the school board to begin to right this ship. It is our turn to step up. I urge you to consider running. I plan to run for Ward 6 in the next election cycle. We cannot afford to stand by and see our curriculum hollowed out.
It’s a simple question: Why? Don’t just tell us “research shows”… Show us the research that proves major changes like this are good for kids & teachers and we’ll get off your back, Mr. Obeng.
Why? Apparently a blatant power play to show “them” who is “in charge.” Burlington, are you still happy with your Canadian choice who lives in South Burlington? National job searches for the best person rarely pan out, and taxpayers are left holding the bag.
not to mention a PART TIME librarian at the school!
From everything I have heard he is completely (along with the opaque school board) out of control and yells at anyone attempting to questions his draconian decisions.
Of course he lives in South Burlington. Burlington schools are a mess.
Moving principals without articulating a clear strategy is very poor leadership. Making “decisions” doesn’t show a command over the issues. This is not the same person who interviewed with us parents on the Hunt stage last year. Time for an independent group to do the promised yearly review of the super. The school board seems as if it’s suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
am writing as a concerned Burlington parent, taxpayer, and long time educator.
To be quite frank, Mr. Porter, what the hell is happening to our school district, and what does this school board have to say on its behalf in regards to its support of this current superintendent? I am beyond belief in the latest fiasco reported in today’s Free Press.
Certainly, many people may have overlooked the idiocy of the school board in the superintendent search having to go beyond our borders. These same people may have even accepted the fact that thousands upon thousands of Burlington taxpayer money was spent frivolously on finding the “suitable leader” for our fantastic and diverse school district. Ultimately, the most ignorant may have even overlooked the fact that, despite his contract stating that Mr. Obeng reside in the district that he leads, he ends up purchasing a home in South Burlington, and his children attend South Burlington Schools.
Truth be told, many more people are asking why. Why is this board so hell bent on supporting the radical, illogical changes that were recently announced? Why is this school board not supporting its teachers? Why is this school board not asking for input from the community? Why is this school board not including students in the decision making process? Why is this school board so focused on improving education for all that we lose sight of the majority? Why is this school board willing to lose vital educational programs for students? Why is this school board willing to allow the mistreatment and illogical reassignments of many of our administrators – revenge under the guise of change – who have, for years, faithfully led this district?
I ask again, what has happened to our school district that we have many community members wondering if perhaps our school board members need to go and a vote of No Confidence is in order for our superintendent? It appears that if our community is not willing to stand up for what’s right, we certainly can’t count on our school board to do it.
I am dismayed by the actions of Mr. Obeng. I am, more surprisingly, dismayed and utterly disgusted by the actions, or lack thereof, of our school board which has allowed these actions to proceed by supporting a stranger, certainly not someone who understands our community or the issues we face. He is an outsider who chose not to live in the most diverse district in the state which he now oversees. This screams of his doubts that The Burlington School District has the capacity and capability to educate his own children. What does this intentional choice actually reveal about his own effectiveness to successfully lead this district?
I would appreciate some logical responses.
In addition, as a classroom teacher, I am fully aware of the problems that plague public education today.
Is anyone on the school board a classroom teacher? Do they understand how to teach not only English, but French, Congolese, Nepali, Spanish, Bhutanese, etc. . The list goes on and on. I am sorry, but I was never trained in my undergraduate or graduate degree how to teach people who do not understand my language. Is there professional development available for BSD teachers and staff to adequately and successfully teach these students? If so, how are these classes created? How do parents feel about classes that are solely designed to teach others to speak English, and, how does this determine classes for other English speaking, white, middle class students?
I fear,sadly, that we are so concerned about teaching a population we are not trained to teach, that our best and brightest students are being denied the strongest and most challenging education to which they are entitled. Do you honestly think Yaw is concerned with the white, middle class students? If you say yes, then obviously, you were not in attendance at the CP Smith meeting where he basically told the PTO patent that he was not interested in hearing about the “privileged middle class students.”
Excuse me, but I have a vested interest in the “privileged, middle class students” simply because I have three of them.
Perhaps more attention, or let me even go so far as to be diplomatic in saying that an equal amount of time be devoted to those students in addition to students in need. It appears as though the focus has shifted so drastically that we have lost sight of our own children.
The “reactive discipline” used on employees who are outspoken, creative, and passionate, is reflective of an exclusionary mindset. Rather than positively supporting members of our community, the central office is reacting punitively. When this kind of practice is used with students it only leads to defensive feelings and poor relationships. This framework is the foundation of the “school-to-prison pipeline”.
While there is little concern shown for the needs of the “privileged middle class” students and families – the decisions made by this administration also hurt the more vulnerable demographics in our community. The anxiety and defensiveness these practices generate within our school community do not create the positive school climate that students with a trauma background – which refugees have experienced by definition – so desperately need. Exclusionary practices lead to higher rates of suspensions/expulsions and drop-outs, which we all know is connected with larger issues of institutionalized racism. Our schools deserve to be institutions with positive, supportive practices that start at the top.