The state’s big-spending, conservative super PAC, Vermonters First, is broadening its focus to specific House and Senate races.
For weeks, the group has filled the airwaves and mailboxes with advertisements opposing “Democrats” generally and supporting two statewide Republican candidates specifically. But mailers and robo-calls sent to homes in St. Albans, Colchester and elsewhere in the state late this week focused newly on candidates for the legislature.
One mailer obtained by Seven Days (pictured right and below) asks voters to support Franklin County state Senate candidates Dustin Degree and Norm McAllister, as well as St. Albans House candidates Casey Toof and Stephen Trahan — all Republicans.
A nearly identical piece hit Colchester Friday, though it called on voters to back Republican House candidates Bob Bouchard and Joey Purvis.
The pieces mostly stick to Vermonters First’s main talking point: that voters should “restore balance” to Montpelier.
“One-party rule in Montpelier does not benefit Vermonters,” it reads. “Today, Democrats control the Vermont State Legislature, the Governor’s office, the Treasurer’s office, Secretary of State, and they are using this unchecked power to push for a government-run health care program that will cost taxpayers at least $5 billion.”
The names of the candidates the super PAC is supporting are in small print at the bottom of one side of the piece. It also includes an absentee-ballot request form.
Tayt Brooks, the group’s treasurer, consultant and sole spokesman, did not return calls seeking comment Friday — but two of the candidates backed by the group did.
“It is what it is. I think it’s politics as of 2012,” said Degree, who is hoping to trade his seat in the House for one in the Senate. “I think in Vermont we like to try to do things a little different, and I think that’s OK. But the Democratic Party has a lot more money than the Republican Party does.”
“I do like that this PAC is bringing some balance to the conversation,” he added.
McAllister’s feelings on the mailing were a little more mixed.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
“”I’m frustrated,” Charyk said. “I don’t think these tactics will work, and I don’t think it’s fair that one person can put this much money into local elections.””
But when statewide Democratic organizations try to influence local legislative races, that’s ok.
“I don’t think it’s fair that one person can put this much money into local elections”
So Mr. Charyk is for limiting free speech of a person. Yup, that’s the democratic way. Heck if Obama can ban free speech around him, why can’t we just inhibit everyone else that doesn’t hold the same view point…
Also, if you don’t think this will work then why would you be frustrated?