A comment submitted to the Federal Communications Commission says Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) is a staunch opponent of Obama-era net neutrality rules designed to protect the open internet. The only problem: Leahy is a longtime vocal proponent of net neutrality, and he had no idea there was a comment filed in his name.
“Oh, my God. I wasn’t aware of that,” Leahy said when he was asked Sunday about the comment. “I have been a consistent and noisy proponent of net neutrality.”
Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan raised the issue of apparently fake FCC comments purportedly filed by Vermont residents this month, following New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s efforts to bring attention to the matter in his state.
The FCC is collecting comments from the public as the five-member commission decides whether to proceed with a proposal from chair Ajit Pai to reverse regulations designed to protect net neutrality.
Donovan’s office created an online portal that allows Vermont residents to search for fake FCC comments filed in their names and then report them to the Vermont Attorney General. Donovan also advised people who find fake comments filed on their behalf to contact the FCC.
“A free and open internet is the lifeblood of modern commerce, and consumers expect transparency and fairness when they go online,” Donovan said in a news release. “Vermont’s small businesses and startups rely on it to be competitive in the global economy and our citizens rely on it for goods, services and information.”
Chris Curtis, the assistant attorney general working on the issue, said net neutrality is vital for the state’s economy. “We cannot have Vermonters and small businesses stuck in the breakdown lane for lack of affordability or lack of access,” Curtis said. The fake comments are problematic because of more than the point of view they advocate, he added. “What really lies underneath all of this is that a vibrant democratic process … really relies on the people being able to weigh in and make their views known so that policymakers and decision makers have an understanding of what the public wants and needs.”
Leahy held a hearing on net neutrality at the University of Vermont in 2014, and numerous Vermont business owners testified in favor of net neutrality rules that require internet service providers to treat all internet traffic equally.
Thousands of the apparently fake comments are voicing opposition to net neutrality. The comments take the position favored by large internet service providers and industry groups: They say net neutrality rules amount to government overreach that will stifle innovation.
When Seven Days told Leahy that a similar comment had been filed on behalf of the Northeast Kingdom ski resort Jay Peak, the senator laughed aloud. (A spokesman for Jay Peak confirmed that the comment is fake.)
“I wonder who’s doing it,” Leahy said.
Columnist John Walters contributed reporting.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Thank you SevenDays for not needlessly playing into the hysteria and lazy media narrative that these are Russian generated comments.
I can pretty much guarantee that the big ISPs are behind these fraudulent comments and that they will be used to “justify” demolishing the internet as we know it.
“I can pretty much guarantee that the big ISPs are behind these fraudulent comments”
Maybe. What is the basis for your guarantee?
Too bad Leahy has accepted half a million dollars from the ISP industry …
https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2017…
Oleander, does that make the comment any less fake?
@Scott – It does not make the comment less fake. It DOES however, illuminate the fact that a politicians words and their FEC filings often tell two different stories.
Take, for instance, TJ Donovan. He says the right things about opiate addiction and how he wants to take positive steps to reduce opiate dependence in Vermont. However, if you look at his campaign finance filings you’ll see maximum gifts from PHRMA (the super PAC for companies including Purdue, the maker of oxycontin), Eli Lilly and Co, and the Retail Pharmaceutical Association. We all know these companies aren’t on the right side of the opiate issue, so why does TJ accept their contributions?
Another instance, Phil Scott talks a decent game about combating climate change, but some of his top donors are Skip Vallee, VT Gas employees and other folks whose bread is buttered by the fossil fuel industry.
This is far afield from fake FCC comments, but this could be a great time to discuss the wide gap between a politician’s statements and who they take money from.
Well said, @Adam.
@Adam –
k