The Vermont Labor Relations Board has ruled against Burlington teachers seeking reimbursement for pay that was docked during a four-day strike in September 2017.
The labor board found that the Burlington School Board was within its rights to decide to withhold teacher pay for days “when they did no work,” according to a July 9 opinion dismissing an unfair labor charge.
The ruling noted that the employer, or school board, “made it clear both before the strike and following the strike that teachers would not receive pay for the time spent on strike.”
Furthermore, the ruling pointed out, the Burlington Education Association signed a contract with no promise of reimbursement for the days.
Burlington Education Association president Andrew Styles declined to comment on the decision, as did Vermont-National Education Association director of communications Darren Allen.
Burlington Superintendent of Schools Yaw Obeng and Burlington School Board chair Clare Wool did not respond to requests for comment.
The union argued that its leaders believed the reimbursement would happen indirectly if the school year was extended by four days with pay.
But rather than extend the calendar, Obeng revised it by switching teacher training days to school days in order to meet state requirements for the length of the school year.
The union argued that the decision undercut the 2.5 percent raise teachers negotiated for 2017-2018 in order to resolve the strike.
The union also argued that it sought to discuss the issue of the revised calendar after the strike, but that the board had “no interest” and adopted the revised schedule without sufficient input.
The labor relations board decision noted that teachers signed a contract that didn’t contain any language explicitly addressing reimbursement for the strike days.
The union has been fighting for reimbursement for more than a year. It filed a grievance over the issue and lost in arbitration in March of this year. In the subsequent unfair labor charge filed with the Vermont Labor Relations Board, the union argued that the matter was still not settled.
The board disagreed in an opinion available here:
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
The funny thing is that teachers are the only profession I can think of that blatantly ties their level of effort to their level of compensation and gets away with it: “Pay me more or your kid gets the half-arsed education, he has a nice future, be a shame if something were to ‘happen’ to it.”
TED COHEN, if you dont think issues related to poverty are a problem in schools Im not sure where to begin…
Its clear that paying teachers less is your solution.
Even though 1/5 of teachers leave the profession before their 4th year because its not worth it. This attrition rate impacts low-performing, high poverty schools, like Burlington, VT (1/3 of BSD teachers have left in the past three years) the most. Discussing the achievement gap is a waste of time if we dont discuss closing the teaching quality gap we are constantly rebuilding staff. An inordinate amount of capital both human and financial is consumed by the constant process of hiring and replacing beginning teachers who leave before they have mastered the ability to create a successful learning culture for students.
And youre saying teachers should be paid less?
Why would you think that, Mr. Cohen? Deflect much from your errors?
JHLT123,
So, Vermont spends more tax money per student than any other state, yet 60 percent of the kids are illiterate.
You’re a teacher, so can you splain the disparity in spending and results – or lack thereof?
That’s all we’re asking. Pretty straightforward question, don’t ya think?
Sorry, but “generational poverty,” “dyslexia,” and “trauma” don’t splain away the lack of results in the face of such massively disproportionate spending.
Go in there and teach those kids Ted Cohen! We need your skills!! Decoding, fluency, phonics… behavior management! …show these teachers how its done! Dont worry about generational poverty, dyslexia, trauma, basic needs not being met. You got this!
A_Trout,
So, you’re satisfied with a 40 percent literacy rate?
Great.
Mr. Cohen’s math skills need work, both in comprehension and in calculation.
He makes multiple mistakes.
First, he uses Ed Week’s numbers, which are cost-adjusted.
Second, he confuses per pupil (a ratio) spending with overall spending (the whole enchilada). Different things entirely.
Third, the national per pupil spending is $12,526. Twice this would be $25,052. Vermont’s per pupil spending is $20,795. So it’s not even close to twice.