In a flashy front page scoop, the Burlington Free Press reported today that Vermont’s three D.C. amigos “will follow President Obama’s lead in giving some of [their] income to charity in response to federal spending cuts.”

The damage? $8700 apiece for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Congressman Peter Welch (D-Vt.), who each make $174,000 a year, and $9670 for Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who pulls in $193,400.

Here’s how Gannett’s Nicole Gaudiano, who covers the Vermont delegation for the Freeps, put it in the story, which ran with the headline, “Shared Sacrifice”: 

The lawmakers, who announced their decisions in response to a Burlington Free Press query, say they will donate 5 percent of their congressional salaries to Vermont charities.

But here’s the thing: It doesn’t quite sound like the three “announced” anything — nor that they were “follow[ing] President Obama’s lead.” 

It sounds a little more like Gaudiano posed a question to the delegation and, not wanting to look like tone-deaf congress-critters, they then decided they were better off giving away the cash than suffering a few tough headlines.

In other words, the tail of the Freeps was wagging the dog of Bernie’s beat-up old wallet.

Got something to say?

Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Paul Heintz was part of the Seven Days news team from 2012 to 2020. He served as political editor and wrote the "Fair Game" political column before becoming a staff writer.

2 replies on “Media Note: Freeps Costs Vermont Delegation $27,000”

  1. What if they suggest rather than a retirement plan from Congress, they and all Congress critters will just get Social Security when they retire? Stop the Drones .Close Gitmo. Free Bradley Manning and Assange.

  2. Dear Paul, I personally find you headline truly “Off Message.” If your point is that there is no reason for Welch and Sanders to share a sacrifice they didn’t endorse or vote for and Leahy should, then why don’t you just run with that? Or is it that you’d like to expose a perceived farce of an article about an announcement that never happened and just sounded like a good idea to agree to? From what I know about our delegation they are leaders. They make tough decisions. They also speak to the press everyday and are much more savvy then to just agree to something on a whim because a reported asked about it.

Comments are closed.