Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) reelection campaign brought in more than $1.26 million in the first three months of 2018, according to a new filing with the Federal Election Commission.
That’s more than five times what the senator raised during the same period last year, but it’s less than the $1.29 million he collected in the second quarter of 2017 and the $1.95 million he raised in the third quarter of that year.
Sanders, who was first elected to the U.S. House in 1990 and the Senate in 2006, has not said whether he will seek reelection this November. No other contenders had filed reports with the FEC as of Monday afternoon.
The vast majority of Sanders’ donations this year came from individual contributors, though the campaign accepted $10,000 from labor and environmental political action committees, such as the Climate Champions PAC and the National Nurses United PAC.
During the same three-month period, Sanders spent nearly $533,000. That left him, at the end of March, with nearly $6.9 million in his Senate reelection fund. But Sanders, who has declined to say whether he would mount a second presidential campaign in 2020, isn’t using the money simply to stump in Vermont.
In a fundraising solicitation Sanders’ reelection campaign sent supporters Monday, longtime political adviser Jeff Weaver wrote that donations to the organization would “support Bernie’s effort to make Medicare for all the law of the land in this country.”
“Make a $3 donation today to help us re-launch our national grassroots organizing campaign with a focus on expanding support for Medicare for all in Congress, state legislatures, and local governments all across the country,” Weaver wrote. “We’re going to organize in communities everywhere, and then we are going to win.”
Sanders’ fundraising this year has far outpaced that of Vermont’s other two congressional delegates.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who won reelection in 2016 and doesn’t face another vote until 2022, brought in $90,438 in the first three months of the year, according to his latest FEC filing. About 44 percent of that money came from special interests, such as the Lockheed Martin Employees PAC, Bank of America Federal PAC and the Universal Music Group PAC.
Congressman Peter Welch (D-Vt.), who is up for reelection in 2018, raised $116,520 for his reelection campaign. Three-quarters of that money came from PACs, including the Petroleum Marketers Association of America, the National Community Pharmacists Association PAC and the Ironworkers Political Action League.
In an interview Monday, Welch denied that the contributions buy influence. He said his fundraising was simply an effort to be ready if an outside group attempted to fund a challenger.
“In the post-Citizens United world, the reality is that the Koch Brothers or any other billionaire can flood a campaign in a moment’s notice with secret money,” Welch said, referring to the 2010 Supreme Court decision that opened the floodgates for money in politics. “I raise money in order to be prepared. And we’ve seen example after example around the country where … secret money comes into these campaigns. It’s changed the world.”
Paul Heintz contributed reporting.
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
“That left [Sanders], at the end of March, with nearly $6.9 million in his Senate reelection fund.”
This is absolutely obscene.
But it’s not enough. He wants more:
“In a fundraising solicitation Sanders’ reelection campaign sent supporters Monday . . .”
Supposedly to run for reelection to his absolutely guaranteed Senate seat from Vermont?
Obscene.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who won reelection in 2016 and doesnt face another vote until 2022, brought in $90,438 in the first three months of the year, according to his latest FEC filing. About 44 percent of that money came from special interests, such as the Lockheed Martin Employees PAC, Bank of America Federal PAC and the Universal Music Group PAC.
Congressman Peter Welch (D-Vt.), who is up for reelection in 2018, raised $116,520 for his reelection campaign. Three-quarters of that money came from PACs, including the Petroleum Marketers Association of America, the National Community Pharmacists PAC and the Ironworkers Political Action League.
No. The amount of money coming from special interests and PACs is obscene whereas “The vast majority of Sanders’ donations this year came from individual contributors,”
No, Philo. Raising obscene amounts of political money, no matter where it comes from, is just that: obscene.
Your hypnotic adoration of The Dear Leader causes you to justify in him the very same characteristics that you would criticize absolutely every other politician for: hypocrisy, greed, narcissism, and the stoking of his personality cult.
Once again, you have missed the point.
I understand your simple point very well, and it is wrong. Your point is that it is ok to raise obscene amounts of money as long as it comes from the right people or in the right amounts. No one else is allowed to do it, but for Bernie its ok.
Wrong. It is still obscene.
Explain why Sanders needs $7 million (the vast majority of which is from outside Vermont, undoubtedly) to run for re-election to the Senate from Vermont this November. Go ahead, explain that. We are all waiting.
And you do realize of course that not all donations to Bernie are $27. Some are much, much bigger than that. Cuz you do understand the concept of averaging, right? So at what dollar amount does a donation go from being good to being bad.
I appreciate your sorites argument. Of course Bernie has larger donors but when half and three quarters of your campaign comes from just a few entities it is a problem. The same problem is highlighted by Mayor Weinberger as well. You are correct about that.
Evasion.
Please explain why an incumbent senator in a state of 600,000 needs $7 million dollars to run for re-election with or without an opponent (and Bernie has none).
Your question, in part, is answered right in the article.
But Sanders, who has declined to say whether he would mount a second presidential campaign in 2020, isn’t using the money simply to stump in Vermont.
In a fundraising solicitation Sanders’ reelection campaign sent supporters Monday, longtime political adviser Jeff Weaver wrote that donations to the organization would “support Bernie’s effort to make Medicare for all the law of the land in this country.”
If you want more information you can look it up.
Evasion. Evasion and hypocrisy. Period.
When you only look at half of what is there and only what you want to see it is easy to draw any kind of rash conclusion. Look at what you did in your original post. You used half of a quotation and then formed your opinion on it. Read the rest of the quotation, you know, the part you left out because it doesn’t support your conclusion.
…longtime political adviser Jeff Weaver wrote that donations to the organization would “support Bernie’s effort to make Medicare for all the law of the land in this country.”
Bernie is being honest as to why he wants the money. It is not simply to run for re-election.
Sanders is all promises promises. The problem with Socialism is that it exists as a viable promise in the jealous minds under capitalism.
Sanders the one note wonder has been chiming this medicare for all BS for 35 years. In all that time he has managed to pass a law renaming a post office. However renaming the post office, hasn’t changed the service there it still is weighing, stamps, sorting and shipping paper paste and spit nothing about the post office has changed Bernie is a gas bag who has never accomplished anything more than BSing a lot of envious people.
He will no more pass medicare for all than fly to the moon on a lawn chair. 3 Dollars gets you a seat at the lawn chair to the moon viewing. Meanwhile Bernie swans around to media outlets selling tickets. How many more years does this septuagenarian gas bag have left to keep lying to you? Probably enough to buy each of his kids a mansion and a summer mansion.
“Bernie is being honest as to why he wants the money.”
Bull****. Bernie can’t “buy” Medicaid For All with the $7 million in his Senate re-election fund. What he wants is a Bernie Slush Fund.
And you are being just as dishonest in criticizing everyone for big money in politics EXCEPT Bernie.
ok ok stop your fighting.. and see the true picture… Socialist Sanders isn’t getting all his donations from his individual contributors,..and using his fund s from the last election..and if you believe this then I have some ocean front property to sell you .. he gets big money from PACs, and others.. Sanders is a socialist who doesn’t use his own money, he uses other people money. He’s a big millionaire now and loves his $1,000 suits, new cars, a fancy boat, 5 new homes and traveling all over campaigning for all the other idiots that running for re-election on the taxpayer’s dime. and traveling all over promoting his stupid book also on the taxpayer’s dime. I would love to see someone come in and challenge him and beat the pants off the socialist. He’s been sitting on his butt way to long.. He needs to get a real mans job..
I am not even sure why we hold elections. Bernie, Peter and Patrick will be with us until they die or get tired of serving. Why do they even have to raise money?