Bill Sorrell and Allen Gilbert found themselves in familiar territory Thursday morning: disagreeing about how much access the public should have to police records.
As the Senate Judiciary Committee began work on a bill to increase access to law enforcement records, the attorney general and head of the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont gave conflicting advice about how far to extend the public’s right to know.
Vermont’s public records laws are among the country’s weakest, allowing some 250 exemptions. But a string of reports about actual and alleged police misconduct have spurred calls for greater police transparency.
Gilbert urged the committee to adopt the federal Freedom of Information standard, which presumes public access to criminal investigative records absent a specific harm that might be caused by their release. He noted that 21 other states and the District of Columbia have already adopted that standard. He said some Vermont police agencies have become “overzealous” in their secrecy, giving the impression that they have something to hide. And that, he said, has eroded trust in police overall.
“How can people trust what police are doing if they can’t even the see the records of something they did five, 10, 25 years ago?” Gilbert asked. “That’s really extreme.”
The Shumlin administration has also proposed adopting the federal open-records standard, but wants an exemption for any records that could “reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy” — a provision that could leave law enforcment agencies with broad discretion.
Sorrell (pictured) countered with a less sweeping proposal: He wants the law to say criminal case files become public only when they involve alleged wrongdoing by a police officer while on duty. Files relating to investigations of private citizens should remain off-limits, he said.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Although I’m not a fan of his, Sorrell’s right on this one. People who are part of an investigation into a crime, but who it turns out did nothing wrong, shouldn’t have their privacy invaded just to satisfy the misguided myopia of the Burlington Free Press and the prying eyes of the public. It serves no public interest whatsoever.