A new poll found that nearly 21 percent of Vermonters think the state should consider “peaceably leaving the United States and becoming an independent republic, as it was from 1777 to 1791.”
That’s a jump from 11.8 percent of respondents who agreed with a similar proposal in a 2007 poll.*
The increase in secessionist sentiment — measured in surveys conducted by the University of Vermont’s Center for Rural Studies — could reflect a Trump bump.
“Given the aggressive and destructive behavior of the United States of Empire this past decade, it is not surprising that more and more forward-thinking Vermonters support independence and a Second Vermont Republic,” Rob Williams, the leader of a Verexit campaign, said in a prepared statement.
Asked in a phone interview Monday about the impact of the 2016 election, Williams said, “The grotesque nature of the Trump presidency has helped crystallize things for Vermonters.”
In a separate poll question, about 58 percent of the 611 respondents said “no” when asked, “Is the federal government adequately serving the needs and concerns of Vermonters?”
The results of the UVM survey, conducted in February, “gives us much more energy to keep pressing what we’ve been doing since 2004,” said Williams, the leader of secession group Second Vermont Republic, or 2VR.
Williams and his associates seek to link their efforts to the sovereign status Vermont enjoyed after declaring its departure from the British Empire in 1777 and before it joined the U.S. as the 14th state in 1791.
The contemporary push for secession first gained ground a decade ago due in part to deepening opposition to then-president George W. Bush. The campaign’s presence all but evaporated following the 2008 election of Barack Obama — and after a controversy that erupted the same year involving the Vermont movement’s flirtation with a pro-secession group known as the League of the South.
The decision to establish ties with the League of the South was initiated by retired Duke University economics professor Thomas Naylor, the prime mover behind the Second Vermont Republic. But the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups, referred to the League of the South at the time as “racist neo-Confederates,” causing considerable political damage in Vermont even as Naylor denied any racist motivation for the collaboration with the group.
Naylor died in 2012, leaving Williams to fill the leadership void in the Vermont secession cause. He rebranded the group 2VR to distinguish it from the Naylor-era movement, which had used the acronym SVR.
Williams, a Waistfield resident and lecturer in UVM’s environmental studies program, said 2VR intends to focus in the coming months on advocating the creation of a state bank. Proponents of secession see efforts to make Vermont more financially self-sufficient as an essential precondition to transforming the state into a nation.
2VR paid UVM’s Center for Rural Studies a total of $1,000 to incorporate into this year’s “Vermonter” poll the questions pertaining to secession and attitudes toward Washington.
The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent.
*Correction, April 25, 2017: A previous version of this story included incorrect
poll results.




Give me a break. 21% is not a majority of Vermonters. I have read about the fringe First Vermont Republic movement. It’s WAS led by people who moved here with the desire of seceding from the federal government (Thomas Naylor). I honestly do not think that supporters understand how important federal dollars are to this small state. We are not Texas or California. We don’t have a large economy or a large population to support secession. It’s a pipe dream and nothing more.
I do want to add that Dr.Rob Williams is an excellent lecturer (I took a course he taught, “Cars, Culture and the Media”). I just don’t buy into the secession movement.
If California and New York go, I’m all in. There is no longer common ground between sane, sentient Homo Sapiens and republiKKKlans.
Let’s see.. the poll… mmm bet you they asked A) just liberal democrats B) college students who aren’t even from Vermont but think they know everything and C) 21 % that is just a big laugh it means they asked maybe 50 people and that’s how they conduct their polling.. Instead of secession and attitudes toward Washington.Why don’t they do something about the liberals in the legislation..you know the legislators, the ones who moved here from another state who think they know more then we (Vermonters) do on how to live our lives..Think it would be better to KICK OUT all these out of state liberals..
what a riot- VERMONT CARRIED TRUMP so guess who’s fault that is….besides Bernie’s!
“what a riot- VERMONT CARRIED TRUMP so guess who’s fault that is….besides Bernie’s!”
Vermont carried Trump? WTF?
I am among those 21%, though they did not poll me:( We have not been a country for decades, just the United States of Corporations, and its time to leave it.
Secession. Now wouldn’t that make all Vermonters REBELS? Wow.
Reminder: The Civil War was fought to preserve the Union after the southern states tried to secede (so they could preserve slavery). Vermonters sacrificed much in that endeavor and the union was preserved. I think talk of secession disrespects those Vermonters who sacrificed their lives lost limbs and whose families were affected for years to come.