This story was reported by Paul Heintz, Kevin J. Kelley and Andy Bromage. Graphics by Tyler Machado.
Riding his outsider image to a decisive victory, Miro Weinberger took Burlington City Hall by a wide margin Tuesday night, becoming the first Democrat to hold the mayor’s office in 31 years.
Now it’s time for Burlington to learn how to pronounce his name.
It’s “muh-ROH,” for the record.
In an election many political observers expected to come down to the wire, Weinberger stormed the city, taking close to 58 percent of the vote to Republican Kurt Wright’s 37 percent and independent Wanda Hines’ five percent. The Democrat heavily outperformed his opponents in the city’s South End and Old North End, and he kept the score close in Wright’s home territory in the more conservative New North End.
“Burlington voters have spoken. They have spoken loud, and they’ve spoken clear. And this city is ready for a fresh start,” Weinberger told a packed house at his campaign’s victory party at Nectar’s. “That fresh start begins tonight.”
Surrounded by his wife, daughter and parents, Weinberger told an enthusiastic crowd, “What this campaign was fueled by from the start was you and your grassroots efforts.”
He said the campaign’s 350 volunteers made 45,000 phone calls since the start of January, including 8500 get-out-the-vote calls today alone. Not mentioned was his massive fundraising advantage. Weinberger outspent Wright by more than two-to-one, raising more money — $118,000 since he joined the race in September — than the entire 2009 mayoral field combined.
The campaign mailed 28,000 pieces of campaign literature.
“It’s only with this type of support that a political outsider with a funny name that no one knew how to pronounce could end up right here tonight,” Weinberger said.
Weinberger’s victory was a big win for the Vermont Democratic Party, which poured organizational and financial resources into the local race. Relishing the taste of victory, party chairman Jake Perkinson took the stage before introducing Weinberger, saying, “It’s been a long time coming.”
Conceding the big challenges facing Weinberger as mayor, Perkinson asked the crowd, “Are you with him?”
“Yeah!” they shouted back.
“I’m taking down all your names,” he responded.
The mood was far more subdued a block away at The Scuffer on Church Street, where Wright’s campaign set up shop as results trickled in. The three-time mayoral candidate conceded the race to reporters early and then huddled with friends and supporters before speaking to the crowd.
“We have run a good campaign. We ran a really positive campaign. I’m proud of the campaign that we ran. Unfortunately, it was not successful,” Wright said.
Thanking those who “stuck their necks out on the line” to support him, Wright said he was proud of the campaign he ran, even if he ultimately came up short.
“As a Republican, I gave it my best shot. I don’t have any regrets. I ran the race that I wanted to run. I ran as who I am and that wasn’t good enough. As I said, I gave it my best shot and that’s all you can do,” he said.
Though congratulating Weinberger and wishing him well, Wright returned to his campaign script, saying he was David going up against Goliath.
“We were running against an opponent who was unknown and had no record, which is a very difficult race, particularly when you’re a Republican in Burlington. We were up against a really well-heeled machine that will probably end up spending maybe $150,000 between the money they spent and the money the party put in,” he said.
Wright told reporters after his concession speech that he would make no immediate decisions about whether he would run for re-election to the Legislature.
Weinberger succeeds two-term Progressive Mayor Bob Kiss, who decided against seeking re-election after the mismanagement of Burlington Telecom left him all but unelectable. Kiss won election in 2006 and again in 2009 with the help of instant-runoff voting, a rank-choice voting system that Burlington voters repealed in 2010.
In this race, many observers predicted that Hines could win 10 percent or more, meaning Weinberger or Wright would clinch victory with less than 50 percent of the vote. To win now in post-IRV Burlington, a mayoral candidate only needs 40 percent plus one of the vote.
Hines (pictured) campaigned largely on her biography as a longtime Burlington resident with close ties to the city’s small but growing minitory community. She ran a bare-bones campaign with no paid staff and little organization on a somewhat vague motto of “Your Choice, Your Community.”
At Channel 17 studios Tuesday night, Hines said the “best person won” — meaning Weinberger — and that he ran a “smart, tactical campaign.” Hines said she expected to do better in her home turf in the Old North End. She finished behind Weinberger and Wright in both Wards 2 and 3. “I guess people aren’t ready to come out,” Hines commented.
During the campaign, Hines frequently defended city hall, where she’s employed as director of the Social Equity Investment Project. Asked whether she felt underprepared for the campaign, Hines replied, “I might not have been versed on issues.” But after numerous debates, she said, “it became a little redundant.”
Asked if she would run again, Hines hesitated before answering: “no.”
Republicans lost one seat on the 14-member city council — the Ward 4 seat Wright vacated to run for mayor. In that ward, Democrat Bryan Aubin beat Republican Ellie Briggs Kenworthy, 1095 to 974. In Ward 7, incumbent Republican Paul Decelles beat Democrat Tom Ayers, 965 to 868.
In other council races: Councilors Ed Adrian (D-Ward 1) and Karen Paul (I-Ward 6) both ran unopposed. In Ward 5, Democrat Chip Mason beat independent Kirstin Daigle, 1177 to 453.
Progressives were able to claim some measure of victory Tuesday night as well, despite losing control of city hall and not running a mayoral candidate this year. Old North End voters showed they still support the Progressive Party’s positions.
Both of the Prog candidates for city council — Max Tracy in Ward 2 and Rachel Siegel in Ward 3 — easily defeated their Democratic opponents, even though Democratic mayoral candidate Weinberger won strong majorities in both wards.
The election outcome adds a seat, Tracy’s, to the Progressive bloc on the 14-member council. The Progs will have three councilors (incumbent Councilor Vince Brennan was not up for re-election) in addition to Ward 1 Independent Sharon Bushor, who usually votes with them. In a politically unfavorable atmosphere, the party has done more than hold its own; it has advanced by recapturing a council seat that has been in Dem hands for the past four years.
The post-vote gathering of about 50 party faithful at Magnolia Bistro on Lawson Lane had the good cheer of a victory party despite the absence of a Progressive candidate at the top of the ticket.
“There’s a new generation of Progressives taking over,” said Morgan Daybell, the party’s executive director. The dual victories in the Prog heartland by Siegel, 41, and Tracy, 25, show “the campaign machine is still alive,” Daybell added. Siegel attributed her win in part to “the tremendous amount of volunteers we had.”
The Town Meeting results will lead the Progs to consider running candidates in Burlington outside the Old North End in fall races for the state legislature, Daybell said.
The Progressives expressed hope for positive political relations with Miro Weinberger, the Democratic victor in the mayoral race.
“I’ve known Miro for a long time and I personally get along great with him,” said Siegel, who revealed that she had nevertheless voted for Independent candidate Wanda Hines. “I hope he will have a balanced way of running things and not keep it party-oriented.”
Vince Brennan, the other Ward 3 Progressive councilor, said dealings with the Democrats could be easier once Bob Kiss is gone. Brennan, who endorsed losing Republican candidate Kurt Wright, said that the Democrats had tried to squeeze Kiss politically on almost every council vote.
Progressives interviewed at Magnolia appeared nonplussed at Kiss’ recent suggestion that he might run for a Chittenden County state Senate seat this year. None of the Progs wished to be quoted by name on this subject, but they made clear that Kiss would be unlikely to have the party’s support to run for Senate and predicted he would have little chance of winning.
At Channel 17, Burlington Progressive Party vice chairman Elijah Bergman praised Weinberger for “exciting people in a new way, attracting people with social media.” Bergman said Weinberger’s experience as a developer and positions on bike lanes is encouraging.
Bergman’s praise is notable because Progressives openly questioned Weinberger’s commitment to working class values during the primary campaign, when many Progs were backing state Sen.Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) in the mayoral caucus. Asked about that, Bergman said Progressives have a whole platform — and that Weinberger shares some, but not all, the Progs’ priorities.
“When there are issues, we will not hesitate to raise issues,” Bergman said. ” But it will not be gratuitous. A lot of Progressives were key to his victory. The real test is going to be governing.”
Click here for a recap of our Town Meeting liveblog.
Burlington City Council Results:
Ward 1
- Adrian (D): 709
Ward 2
- Tracy (P): 503
- Hammerslough (D): 297
Ward 3
- Siegel (P): 755
- Hurley (D): 440
- Ruloff (I): 44
- Salese (I): 40
Ward 4
- Aubin (D): 1095
- Kenworthy (R): 974
Ward 5
- Mason (D): 1177
- Daigle (I): 453
Ward 6
- Paul (I): 1118
Ward 7
- Decelles (R): 965
- Ayres (D): 868
Burlington School Budget
- Yes: 5359
- No: 4490
This article appears in The Real Estate Issue 2012.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Why is it such a surprise that the Progs wouldn’t support Kiss? Brennan endorsed Wright. Ashe endorsed Weinberger. Bernie endorsed Weinberger. Isn’t it time to stop trying to delude people that there’s a Progressive Party? They continue to delude themselves that Bernie is a Progressive. They delude themselves that Clavelle was a Progressive even though it was widely known he didn’t care about party politics. It’s time to say you’re toast when a “Progressive City” turns out only 500 votes for a candidate who so closely shares your values in favor a Mitt Romney Democrat.
Congrats to Miro.
Whats still a little sad is the numbers. Total that voted is around ~ 10,000 people. That is about 1/4 of the population of Burlington.
Just saying…
Miro!
Several dynamics were in play during this election. Though positive reactions toward Wanda were evident from the three parties, the decision, 1. That a vote for Miro was preferred over Wright in the old north end because of a fear of splitting left-leaning votes. 2. Many in the small but growing New American community have not yet received citizenship due to lack of financies and loops you need to jump through these days. 3. Many Wanda supporters are very poor and didn’t have the resources to get extra childcare to go out and leaflet on many days, or work long low wage jobs and can’t take time off to be more involved. 4. It was a very middle class and upper class turnout with 2/3 of the registered voters not voting.
5.If we had continued IRV, Wanda would have been a strong second choice through much of the city.
6. Wanda as a community organizer has positively impacted this city over her many years here. She will continue to be effective and aware of the ongoing cultural changes happening in Burlington. She is already at the table waiting for the rest of us to join.
@ SofiaI:
Yes, Burlington has a population of about 40,000 but some of those prople are . . . kids and other non-voters. Not everyone in the population is eligible to vote . . .
According to today’s Free press, there are 25,000 registered voters.
According to the election results, there are 35,501 registered voters in Burlington http://www.burlingtonvt.gov/CT… and only 28.53% of them actually voted. Lesson learned: it’s best to go straight to the source rather than trust the Free Press.
I can cite several other reasons for Miro Weinberger’s near-landslide victory:
1) Turnout in the GOP presidential primary in Burlington was a record low, according to the City Clerk’s office, indicative of a lack of enthusiasm among Burlington Republicans to even bother to vote, which is why Wright was barely able to best Weinberger in the GOP stronghold of the New North End and the Republicans lost Wright’s vacated Ward 4 City Council seat to Democrat Bryan Aubin.
2) Wright got little help form the state GOP. That was partly by design, as he is much more moderate than most of his GOP colleagues in the Legislature. Moreover, conservative Republicans are still angry at Wright for defying his party on the issue of same-sex marriage. Wright voted in favor of the marriage equality bill and subsequently in favor of overriding then-Gov. Jim Douglas’ veto.
3) Wright clearly hurt his own cause by advocating selling the Burlington Electric Department. Given that Burlingtonians pay the lowest electric power rates in the state, Wright’s proposal was doomed to go nowhere.
4) Even Wright himself knew that in a left-leaning city like Burlington, the Republican brand is mud, with the national GOP moving ever farther to the right. This was not only Wright’s dilemma, but it’s becoming a deeper problem for Vermont Republicans throughout the state.
10,000 is *not* a bad turnout. i doubt that there are even 20,000 eligible voters. some of the population of Burlington are kids and others who are not eligible voters.
well, one thing Mark, 3 years ago we *did* have IRV (and i voted to keep it, even though i was well aware of the anomalies of the 2009 election) and Andy was a much stronger second choice throughout all of the city (so much so that Andy was the pairwise champion; he would have beaten either Bob or Kurt in the final round had he been in the final round and the fact that he was not elected was the source of the anomalous outcome in 2009) than i think Wanda was. Wanda was an outlier but Andy was a co-equal among Kurt and Bob (any of the three could have won).
@ BB:
I would question the figure of 35,500 registered voters. Think about it. A total population of 40,000+ and 35,500 registered voters? That’s an 87% rate of registered voters to total population. That doesn’t even seem to make sense.
Maybe the City’s figure is right. And lord knows you are correct to say we should question anything the FP says. However, given the City’s imbecility of the last 6 years, should we necessarily trust any information it provides?
College students were on spring break.
This voter list came from the state as of November 2011:
—————————————————————————–
$ wc -l vt-voter-list
440432 vt-voter-list$ grep INACTIVE vt-voter-list ¦ wc -l40901
$ grep “05401” vt-voter-list ¦wc -l23780
$ grep “05401” vt-voter-list ¦grep INACTIVE ¦ wc -l
6501
$ grep “05405” vt-voter-list ¦wc -l3330
$ grep “05405” vt-voter-list ¦grep INACTIVE ¦ wc -l
1033
$ grep “05408” vt-voter-list ¦ wc -l
7436
$ grep “05408 vt-voter-list ¦grep INACTIVE ¦ wc -l1133
* 05402, 05406 are mostly PO Boxes, of which some belong to Burlington voters
—————————————————————————–
I.E., for the 23780 registered voters in the 05401 ZIP code (Burlington’s largest), 6501 were “INACTIVE/CHALLENGED.” That’s 27%, as opposed to a 9% average for the state as a whole.
Burlington contains a few other ZIPs. The 35K number appears to be the full voter list, including those marked “INACTIVE/CHALLENGED,” and the 25K could be be only the ACTIVE. Other status possibilities include “NO OATH”, “1ST TIME VOTER ID NOT VERIFIED”, “DRIVERS LICENSE NOT VERIFIED”, etc.
Make of it what you will. College students are a part of it, especially in 05405. I have no inside info about what drives the challenging, the retention/removal decision, and the updating of this field vs purging of records from the list. I don’t know whether those people who had “INACTIVE/CHALLENGED” statuses have been purged from the electronic rolls since November or whether any “INACTIVE/CHALLENGED” voters were printed on the checklist on March 6. I just suspect that some people don’t know about this voter status column.
I am impressed by the quality of
information on this website. There are a lot of good resources here. I am
sure I will visit this place again soon.