Recently, I’ve been asking myself the question in this post’s title. Why do people hate safety? What is so offensive about trying to be safe and not die a bloody, mangled mess? Perhaps I should explain what I’m talking about.
Photo on the right is what happens when you hate safety.
For the past couple months, my girlfriend and I have been volunteering for the Safe Streets Collaborative, a partnership between Local Motion and the Burlington Police Department, as well as other community members and organizations. The point of the collaborative is just like it sounds — to make streets safer for everyone using them. Sounds pretty inoffensive to me. Again, I ask who doesn’t like safety.
Our volunteering has taken the form of “intersection intervention,” or, as I call it, Bike Light Recon. Basically, that means that we and other bike nerds stand on busy corners at night and flag down cyclists who do not have lights on their bikes. In Burlington, it is required that people have a flashing white light on the front of their bike and at least a reflector in the back. Most people don’t know this is a city statute, thus the point of the Bike Light Recon. It’s all about Ed-U-Cation.
Also the point of Bike Light Recon: making the streets safer for cars, pedestrians, cyclists, wheelchairs, old people, people who are infirm, dogs, squirrels, etc. But apparently that is offensive to people. I’ll explain.
Here’s the gist of Bike Light Recon: two or three volunteers per corner are partnered with one of Burlington’s finest. Cops are wearing their police outfits; volunteers are wearing helmets and safety vests. Yes, safety vests. No, they’re not high fashion — mine was a little snug, I’ll admit — but they help prevent cars from making pizza out of my innards.
When we see a cyclist cruising along without the required lights, the volunteers flag them down, ask if we can talk to them for a sec, tell them about the city laws regarding bike lights and give them a coupon to get a bike light at any of the bike shops in town. Then the cop comes over and puts the fear of Jesus in the offending cyclist by telling him or her that he could give a $50 ticket for the offense, but he won’t because he’s a nice dude.
In less than three minutes, the cyclist is on her way with a coupon in her pocket and a better understanding of the rules of the road. By and large, the people we flagged at the corner of N. Winooski and Pearl streets were respectful and attentive. Some were chronic inebriates who should really never operate anything with moving parts. Others were “in a hurry,” which is code for “I don’t give a flying pig shit what you want to talk to me about. I’ve got a very important appointment to get my drink on at Esox and you’re preventing me from accomplishing my mission.”
The couple times we’ve done this, we’ve gotten heckled. We’ve been called a bike gang because of our vests (Whatever. Safety first.), and we’ve had people make fun of our helmets and tell us to “be safe,” their voices dripping with sarcasm. Yeah, I am safe, thanks. You never know when you might just fall over on the sidewalk. A helmet could save your life.
Christ, it’s not like we’re Jehovah’s Witnesses or Mormons or Scientologists. We’re not trying to eat their babies or make them renounce their families or whatever. What I don’t get is why people feel the need to say anything. One guy said helmets were dumb. Another said we were instituting “martial law” because we were trying to get people to not get hit by cars on their bikes. I’ll tell you what, pal, how’s about I buy you a plane ticket to, say, Guinea or Libya or Pakistan or another country run by the military and see if you still feel that getting people to use bike lights is tantamount to martial law.
I get that we look silly, but so do men with eyebrow rings, and you don’t hear me crapping on them. So what’s the deal? Is it the idea that people who don’t wear helmets or use lights on their bikes feel threatened by those of us who do, as if our rule-following and desire to be safe is somehow a tacit indictment of their behavior?
It’s like why so many people hate vegetarians, because they feel that their shunning of meat is a condemnation of people who do eat meat. Same thing with teetotalers. I can speak to both of those because I neither eat meat nor drink. But frankly, I could not care less if you drink yourself to a liver transplant or end up with arteries clogged with bologna.
So what are your theories on why people hate safety, apart from the fact that they must have tiny hoo-hoo dillies? Do you hate safety, or people trying to encourage you to be more safe? If so, why? Were you the ones heckling us on Friday night? Do you want me to have to get feral on your ass next time? Just asking.
This article appears in Oct 21-27, 2009.


I am in Occupational Safety as a profession. I can tell you that even though this is my career, people still have a tendency to s**t all over it. I’ve been heckled, talked down to, and ignored more times than I’d like to remember. No one wants to follow the rules and guidelines when it comes to safety, be responsible for their own safety, despise being held accountable to the same, and think I’m some desk jockey telling them “how” to do their job. When they are injured on the job though, I am expected to move heaven and earth to fix the issue with no funding and no support. Go figure.
Why bother with the volunteers or worry about making it less confrontational? Cops should just stop bicyclists and ticket them… randomly. You know, DO THEIR JOB. I guarantee that would cut down on scofflaw bicyclists. Duh.
I love how whenever bicycle/car issues arise, you hear all these “one time, a bicyclist ran the red light and I almost hit him” stories. I have so many “one time, a driver ran the red light and almost hit my kid and the crossing guard” stories.It’s simple: bicyclists and drivers need to respect the rules of the road. Don’t be stupid or reckless.
Hey Jay Vos: I think the sharrows are on Pine because in order to go North/South in that part of town it’s basically either Pine or Shelburne Road, which is an even more heavily trafficked road with even more trucks.
Jimmy, the cop is going to give chase because you (or the cyclist without lights) were breaking the law, not because you were a rude to a volunteer. They’re getting serious about traffic enforcement as it pertains to cyclists. If you don’t believe me, talk to Lt. Bill Ward at BPD.
I had to do research about what the graphic arrows and bikes goin’ up Pine Street are. Well, y’all they are called “sharrows,” which mean share the road. I share the road always, but honestly, why are there not signs along Pine to tell motorists what they are (use the sharrow graphic with “Share the Road” would be my idea). Also, why on Pine??? It’s a heavily trafficked road with lots of trucks. Also the bicyclists don’t share the road…they pedal up the middle of the northbound lane and don’t move to the right to let cars pass. I’ve seen it more than once.Another thing: On Saturday, at the intersection of S. Winooski and Main, there was congestion while waiting for the light to change. I was stopped in the right-turn lane and surprise! a bicyclist appeared to my left, goin’ like a bat out of hell and veered in front of me just as the light was changing to green. Scared the shit out of me, as he was going so fast! I made my turn and he went down the middle of Main – through the red light as he made a left turn onto (lower) Church Street, nearly hitting pedestrians who were walking across Main. Without a helmet, too.
Somehow I doubt a cop is going to give chase because I cruised past a civilian with a goofy vest on.
Jimmy, It’s more that we were asking politely if we could talk to people for a second and explain the law to them so the officer behind us wouldn’t give them a ticket. If they took off without listening, more than likely, the cop would catch up to them and give them a ticket for not obeying traffic laws. It pays to be courteous and also to comply with people who are approaching you respectfully. But if you want a ticket, dude, feel free to ignore the volunteers.