Corrections Commissioner Jim Baker told lawmakers Wednesday that the threat of coronavirus is already straining Vermont’s prison system, but he argued that releasing inmates could further endanger them.
Speaking by phone to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Baker said that the outbreak has worsened the Department of Corrections’ preexisting workforce crisis. “By the middle of next week, our staffing will be stressed inside the facility,” he said.
To make up for a projected shortage of corrections officers, the department plans to train and certify some of its 143 probation and parole officers to work inside the state’s six prisons.
According to Baker, the department has managed to reduce Vermont’s prison population from 1,671 to 1,628 over the past three weeks, but he cautioned against opening the gates too wide.
“I hear from a lot of folks about who should be let out of jail,” he said. “But I gotta tell you, I’d be worried about the level of care that they’d get outside. The system would be stressed even more. It’s not as simple as people [are] making it sound. And in some case, folks have nowhere to go.”
According to Baker, no Vermont prisoners have been given a test for the virus because none have exhibited symptoms that would require one — and because test kits are in short supply.
Sen. Phil Baruth (D/P-Chittenden) told Baker that he believed every inmate in the state should be tested. “If we had test kits, that would be ideal, but we don’t,” the commissioner responded.
As Seven Days reported Monday, the Vermont Prisoners’ Rights Office has called on the department to use its furlough authority to release “as many inmates as possible.” Defender General Matthew Valerio warned that the prisons could become “cruise ship”-like environments if the virus enters the facilities.
On Tuesday, Chittenden County State’s Attorney Sarah George joined prosecutors around the country in calling for a “dramatic reduction” in the nation’s prison population as coronavirus spreads. On Wednesday, ACLU of Vermont executive director James Lyall called on Gov. Phil Scott to “act immediately to protect the lives of people in Vermont’s prison system” by releasing current inmates, limiting new admissions, and taking measures to protect the health and safety of those under the department’s supervision.
“Vermont has days, not weeks, to take meaningful preventive action,” Lyall wrote.
The department has taken some steps to keep coronavirus out of the prisons, including banning in-person visits and enhancing medical screening of new inmates. “The way we’re gonna end up getting the virus in the facilities is through the front door,” Baker told lawmakers. “Anything we can do to mitigate people coming and going is our strategy.”
According to John Campbell, executive director of the Department of State’s Attorneys and Sheriffs, Vermont prosecutors “are doing everything [they] can to make sure that people are not being brought into the system” unnecessarily. Only in “the most extreme circumstances” are they being sent to prison, he told committee members.
Chief Superior Judge Brian Grearson said he was working with Campbell’s and Valerio’s offices to review a list of inmates provided by the Department of Corrections to “see if there’s folks we can move out of there.”
Campbell said prosecutors throughout the state had been “inundated” with motions seeking the release of prisoners.
“Certainly there are some that, if we were able to make sure that they have some available housing … it would be fine to go ahead and release them,” he said. “There are others that have other serious issues that I think if released … into the community would absolutely jeopardize the safety of those in the communities where they’re released.”
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Don’t know what these “advocates” are thinking, or they really have any concept of life for these inmates after they’re released. What happened when a bunch of women were released, per the DA, one ended up back and forth to jail, eventually ending up in the hospital
We already have people waiting for release, past their minimums, because they have no support and nowhere to go.
Now they want to release the most vulnerable people, to…where….homeless shelters that already are concerned about providing for the people they already have? Where will they go, what will they eat, etc.
Release them from the petri dish.
Put the worst criminals together in small cells.
Just lock up the dolts who are saying this is a hoax.
I can see letting out those that are in for nonviolent offenses, that would make room for those who need to stay on the inside .
Yeah – that would never add to the potential for anarchy… criminals with no place to go- possibly no money and a timid population. That couldn’t possibly end badly.
Refer also to the article on the brisk business gun shops are doing.
Putting the welfare of criminals, defined as people who HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME, before the safety of the general public is ludicrous. Vulnerable population? To what? How about putting the health of the public at risk making us a vulnerable population? A corrections commissioner with no common sense is what ails Vermont.
And why are the States attorneys thinking they are so great that they can video call the court instead of showing up just like the scheduled people and the public defender? They should have to go to court just like everyone else!
Same as homeless people, the problem is they become hundreds of ticking time bombs ready to infect the guards and anyone they come in contact with. For months. It needs to be avoided for our sake.
My brothers residence was approved weeks ago, hes a low level violation of probation case and hes been there 9 months. They aren’t trying to move people out. The moved a bunch of women out and that’s it.