Updated at 5:11 p.m.
Faced with a projected revenue downgrade of $31 million, Gov. Peter Shumlin asked members of his cabinet Wednesday evening to come up with significant budget cuts throughout state government.
During a press conference Thursday morning in his Montpelier office, the governor blamed the bad news on the lingering effects of the 2008 financial crisis — and economists’ rosy projections about the pace of recovery.
“We continue to recover, but this has been a slow crawl back from the worst recession in American history — and Vermont’s not immune to that,” Shumlin said.
Though the downgrade to fiscal year 2015 revenue projections amounts to roughly 2 percent of the state’s $1.4 billion general fund budget, the governor asked his secretaries and commissioners to recommend 4 percent in cuts throughout their agencies and departments. That’s because he plans to spare the state’s contribution to its retirement funds, as well as its debt obligations. He also pledged to avoid raiding the education fund or raising income, sales or rooms and meals taxes to fill the gap.
“We’re not going to ask hardworking Vermonters to make this relatively small adjustment by raising revenue,” Shumlin said. “Vermonters’ taxes are high enough.”
The governor expressed confidence that his administration could find the savings without laying off state workers, though Secretary of Administration Jeb Spaulding said he had ordered an immediate hiring freeze and a reduction in discretionary spending.
Shumin went to great lengths to downplay the severity of the downgrade and its impact on the state budget — at one point instructing reporters in attendance to “cheer up.” He noted that revenues are still expected to increase by 3 percent this year — just not as high as the 4.8 percent his administration had anticipated.
“This really is no different than when a family thinks they have a raise coming. They get a raise, but the raise is a little smaller than they had projected,” he said. “The good news is it’s July, not January. That gives us almost the entire fiscal year to make this adjustment.”
Shumlin plans to meet with the state’s Emergency Board Thursday afternoon to brief them on the news and formulate a plan to address it.
Later Thursday, members of the state’s Emergency Board, which includes top legislative and administration officials, formally adopted the new revenue projections. That set into motion a 21-day process during which the administration must recommend budget adjustments and the legislature’s Joint Fiscal Committee must approve them.
Spaulding said he had instructed secretaries and commissioners to propose cuts within their agencies and departments by next Thursday. He said the administration would present its plan to legislators by August 11. Shumlin told lawmakers that he hoped the re-budgeting would be a “collaborative process.”
The Emergency Board meeting attracted a healthy audience of state officials and reporters — and one unexpected guest: Republican gubernatorial candidate Scott Milne. The candidate departed before the meeting concluded and did not immediately return a call for comment.
After the meeting, House Ways and Means Committee Chairwoman Janet Ancel (D-Calais) expressed optimism that officials could close the gap.
“It seems like a lot of money, but we’ve solved bigger problems than this before,” she said.



Yes it all goes back to 2008. The overspending after 2008 had nothing to do with this, of course not. According to a study by the tax foundaton, Vermont’s per capita It was somebody else’s fault. Over a 7 year cylce, this administration has nothing to write home about, and according to a study by the tax foundation with a prog/dem legislature in full swing since 04, the per capita tax burden in Vermont from 2001-2011 has increased 34%, 4th highest of the 50 states. NY was fifth highest at 16.9%, and Maine was 15th. Since 2011, there has been no effort to mitigate overspending at all. This was a no-brainer. http://taxfoundation.org/blog/monday-map-growth-state-tax-collections-2001-2011
So, During his photo-op with Cuomo, and attempt to school the voters of Maine about Le Page, he himself will learn the hard lesson at the expense of the State of Vermont. The LePage lecture should fall on deaf ears. He can’t even get an economic spark in his own State, and even Cuomo acknowledges that they have a SPENDING AND TAXING problem in NY state – with several counties with highest property taxes in the US. Even Cuomo has made some attempt to remedy the problem.
Chronic Over spending leads to more TAXES. Business stop hiring. Consumers have no disposable income. And he looks so damn sad in this picture. Bad Actor.
Typical of a Socialist Democrat… Mr. Shumlin might be seeing what working conservatives have been preaching for the past 6 years. Socialism only works up until the point you reach when you run out of other people’s money to spend. What we need in Vermont are some productive and well-paying jobs and a whole lot less spending on people whom are not willing to be productive. It seems that good jobs are not service industry or retail minimum-wage positions. Perhaps we could look at making Vermont friendly to industry?