Updated at 5:48 p.m.
After a California professor alleged Sunday that Judge Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her when they both were teenagers, Vermont’s congressional delegation urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to halt its consideration of his nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
All three members — Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Congressman Peter Welch (D-Vt.) — said the committee’s planned Thursday vote on the nomination should be postponed until authorities could fully investigate the claims. In an interview with Seven Days on Monday afternoon, Leahy said that Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, should both testify before the committee, on which Leahy serves.
“She’s willing to testify under oath,” the senator said. “Let her!”
Details of the allegations have trickled out since the committee’s ranking member, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), briefed fellow Democrats last Wednesday, but Blasey Ford’s identity was not known until Sunday, when she shared her story with the Washington Post. She said that at a party in suburban Maryland in the early 1980s, a drunken Kavanaugh had pinned her to a bed, groped her and attempted to remove her clothes.
“I find her allegations worth looking into professionally,” Leahy said in the interview. “I mean, she’s shown some very incredible courage even coming in here and we’re dealing with a nominee whose veracity is already an issue.”
Kavanaugh has denied that the incident occurred, and another man who Blasey Ford alleged participated in the assault has said he has no memory of it.
“This is a completely false allegation,” Kavanaugh said Monday in a written statement. “I have never done anything like what the accuser describes — to her or to anyone. Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday.” He added that he was willing to address the allegation in front of the Senate committee.
On Sunday afternoon, Sanders and Welch released written statements calling for the panel to delay its vote.
“The allegation from Professor Christine Blasey Ford is a serious one that deserves a full investigation,” Sanders said in his statement. “Neither the Judiciary Committee nor the full Senate should vote on Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court until that takes place.”
Moments later, Welch issued his statement. “I applaud Christine Blasey Ford for her courage in coming forward,” he wrote. “These allegations are credible and deeply troubling. The Senate should immediately pause the confirmation process and insist upon a thorough investigation by the FBI. In the meantime, I hope Ms. Blasey Ford receives the respect and dignity to which she is entitled.”
Leahy, the most senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced last Thursday in the Washington Post that he would vote against Kavanaugh’s confirmation. He was asked about the allegations Friday in an interview with C-SPAN — before Blasey Ford went public with her account — and declined to directly address them.
“Any issues that have come up have been turned over to the people that do the background investigations and we’ll see what they come up with,” Leahy said at the time.
Asked whether he agreed with Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) that the committee should delay its vote pending an investigation, Leahy said, “That would make sense. Another week or two — what difference would it make? We’re talking about a lifetime appointment. Two weeks? Three weeks? I think the American people, whether they’re Republicans or Democrats, are going to face the consequences of who goes on the Supreme Court. Let the investigation get done.”
Leahy did not weigh in on the matter again until late Monday morning, when he joined all of his fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee in ordering its chair, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), to postpone the vote so that the Federal Bureau of Investigation could investigate.
“We cannot brush aside these extraordinarily serious allegations in an unseemly rush to confirm Judge Kavanaugh to a lifetime seat,” Leahy said in a separate statement issued later Monday morning.
In the interview with Seven Days, Leahy said he learned of Blasey Ford’s allegations last week, when he was pulled off the floor of the Senate during a debate over a trio of appropriations bills. While Republican senators and some Democrats have criticized Feinstein for keeping quiet about the claims until last week, Leahy said he would not “second-guess” his successor.
“She is a person of integrity,” Leahy said of Feinstein. “She, I think, saw a witness that at first asked to be kept anonymous. Now [Feinstein has] talked to [Blasey Ford] and got her to agree to come forward publicly. I think that’s a pretty good step forward.”
Leahy dismissed Republican complaints that the information was coming to light near the end of the confirmation process, arguing that they had rushed the process and failed to turn over records of Kavanaugh’s government service.
“No, because the last minute is the accelerated time they set,” Leahy said. “They can’t say this is the last minute when they jammed this thing through and asked for a vote long before all the information is in.”
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
well of course they are going to vote no anyways ,,,three fools of vermont
Feinstein and her lackey Dems are transparent scheming swamp dwellers.
Two drunk high school boys claim they have no memory of this incident. Since when do we think drunk high school boys are good reporters of their misdeeds? I can assure you that a young girl assaulted in this way remembers every detail of such an event, and it goes in her personal catalogue of abuse. If this took place in the ’80s, I can assure you her catalogue is undoubtedly quite full by now.
The 3 baldies of Vermont. what a joke they are.. This so-called accuser waited this long to report the attack? She’s a democrat, anti-Trump hater. who was probably paid off to do this? Feinstein said she’s had this letter for months now.. The Swamp is getting dirtier and dirtier. Just like the Swamp in Montpelier. They are going to find out she is lying, which will make it harder on real victims.
If she was so distraught over this, why has she not said anything until now? No matter who you voted for, this should be very disconcerning as the government is trying to steal more of our rights. 1st attorney client privileges, now holding actions from over 30 years ago from when they were a teen?
to bad our reps can’t think for themselves… its a disservice when they expose themselves as idiots.
Bernie won’t even speak to the vt press what bs
More fake news, Republicans?
From a speech Kavanaugh gave to the Yale Law School Federalist Society:
“We got our work done, but we had our share of fun. During our third year class party, it was a beautiful night then as it is tonight. We were at the Lawn Club…. We had a memorable evening. It is fair to say that we had a few drinks. Indeed, as a classmate of mine and I were reminiscing and piecing things together the other day, we think we had more than a few beers before the banquet. Might have been at Toads. Not a good idea.
Anyway, toward the end of the evening a friend of mine who shall remain namelessand this is a story that is really about a friend of mine, not about me where I am disguising myself as a friend of minemy friend broke a table in the Lawn Club reception area. Smashed it into multiple pieces. I actually still possess a photo of him sprawled on the floor on top of the table. Howd did he break it, you might ask? The old-fashioned way. He lost his balance and fell into the table, drink in hand, and the table collapsed. My friend was a big guy.
Now, you might think that we would have quickly left the Lawn Club after that, with some sense of shame. But youd be wrong. My friend actually tried to get another drink at the bar. Proving something I have always knownthat bartenders have a lot more common sense than many law school studentsthe bartender refused to serve my friend.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/…
I demand that Leahy and Sanders open an investigation into the “2” envelopes passed to Fords attorney by a Texas senator be investigated ! Payoff? Bribe?