Remember John D. Haywood, the Democrat who challenged President Barack Obama in the New Hampshire primary?
Neither do we.
Haywood didn’t get much press in the run-up to the first-in-the-nation primary — nor did a dozen other also-rans whose names appeared on the ballot. But journalism students of Saint Michael’s College took the time to interview and profile each and every B-lister on the New Hampshire primary ballot in the name of the democracy.
Now one of those candidates — Haywood — is suing St. Mike’s, and the two student journalists who penned his profile, for libel. In a federal lawsuit filed at U.S. District Court in Burlington, Haywood claims that the article — published online six days before the Jan. 10 primary — contained numerous mis-characterizations about his record and portrayed him as a “bumbling, inept monster.”
Haywood blames the article for costing him the race against Obama; Haywood received just 432 votes, the lawsuit notes, losing to the prez by a ratio of 115 to 1.
And here’s the kicker. Haywood wants the court to award him a metric shit-ton in damages: $1 million to compensate him for “the permanent damage to his reputation” in his home community of Durham, N.C., $50 million in punitive damages, and $120,202 to reimburse what his campaign spent on newspaper advertising. (Because, you know, the college journalism piece totally sunk his White House dreams).
Haywood’s justification for that eye-popping sum? “It is … an amount that will, after taxes, enable Plaintiff to run in 2016 with a cleared name and and [sic] the ability to do the advertising that can perhaps overcome his low 2012 vote count.”


Did he file it pro se? I can’t believe any lawyer with any itegriity would participate in that kind of drivel.
You overestimate lawyers.
A lawyer who filed that would face fines and censure. It’s ridiculous.
Can 7Days pull the complaint and answer off PACER and put them on DocStock for our viewing?
I hope St. Mikes also files for an award of attorney fee’s. This is the definition of frivilous.
Mr. Haywood’s lawsuit should attract Journalists attention to the defense. It will send a chill into a Free Press if he prevail’s. Frivolous as it is, under the wrong judge it can stifle a Free Press into not reporting what a candidate is saying without their OK.
Typical cry baby liberal hates it when he loses because his own words and beliefs were exposed. Cry me a river.