sell your ride
post your service
sell your stuff
post your class
browse all jobs
post a job
homes for sale
for sale by owner
post your listing
If you're looking for "I Spys," dating or LTRs, this is your scene.
If you're looking for full-on kink or group play, you'll get what you need here.
Genese is a remarkable person who contributed enormously to this community through her campaign, as did all of the candidates who gave their time and energy to run.
I question the civic value and utility of a comment platform like this that allows those so disposed to lurk anonymously in dark corners and spew venom. That's not the civic discourse that supports and advances democracy, but quite the opposite.
It's tempting and easy to take the "high road" and look down on intolerant protesters with little appreciation for civil discourse or the First Amendment, but the real failure here is departmental and institutional. "Racist pseudoscience" -- if the Southern Poverty Law Center's characterization is correct -- does not merit a platform at our universities to legitimize itself. Such extremism and alternative facts have increasingly been cloaking themselves in the mantle of the normal distribution. They don't belong, not even for forty-five minutes.
Students of the American Enterprise Institute Club can be forgiven for thinking Murray provocative rather than dangerous and irresponsible, but Middlebury's academic leaders should have known better.
Under the circumstances, the students who refused to listen politely or to patiently await a chance to ask some pointed questions, made the most eloquent statement .
Ethics expert Palmer notes that "such business relationships . . . could raise questions." City Attorney Blackwood explains that this situation might be covered by "a city ethics policy . . . though Burlington doesn't have one."
Should citizens be reassured that ethical standards are so high in city government that an ethics policy is unnecessary? Or should citizens be worried that the mayor and city council have assigned the development of an ethics policy to the backburner indefinitely?
Genese Grill and other well-qualified candidates challenging the status quo aim to bring back neighborhood power and good faith democratic process that have fallen by the wayside. This would be a godsend for the people of Burlington, people that the Burlington Business Association and other lobbyists are not watching out for.
The anonymous source claiming to have attended a candidate forum "with an open mind" proceeds immediately with a personal attack belying such a claim.
Personal attacks in place of substantive discussion have become the standard tactic of apologists for the status quo -- from Miro's hysterical "reactionary fringe" comment on down to a number of the pseudonymous comments we see here.
The nominally democratic administration currently in power locally is far more Trumpish than many suppose. This administration is enthusiastic about deregulation, about subsidizing private business, and about privatizing public assets. This administration is not shy about bringing buddies into key positions and it's so eager for development dollars that it will rewrite zoning regulations to clear the way. It pays lip service to affordable housing, but seems more serious about eroding inclusionary zoning to "improve" it.
These are not values usually associated with the Democratic Party or the Progressive Party. They are in fact solidly Republican/Trumpish values, but they are indeed what we face in City Hall and on the City Council at the moment.
It's time for a change, not more of the same.
The thrust of this report is to lighten the burden on developers, increase the burden on property tax payers, and ignore the importance of fair wages in addressing the affordable housing problem. Expensive consultants should not have been necessary to describe the effects of an ordinance which have played out under the direct supervision of city officials year by year. The analysis offered is far more speculative than authoritative.
No doubt some will seek to leverage the weight of a report like this to undermine inclusionary zoning and then congratulate themselves for improving it. The most obvious target is the existing five unit threshold. The report is factually in error in calling this a low threshold. The comparables the report itself provides prove otherwise. Raising the threshold to ten will do nothing to support affordable housing while enabling multiple developments of up to nine units with no affordable housing component at all.
The recommendation to lower the payment in lieu of developing inclusionary units is another unjustified giveaway that would erode Burlington's commitment to affordable housing. Overall, this report is more of a Trojan Horse than a source of insight.
Martha has it right. The nice guy Republicans who manage statewide electoral success in Vermont can be as extreme as the not so nice Republicans we see elsewhere, given the chance.
Is that seb8085 hiding behind a pseudonym????!
Hypocritical? Negative? Credible?
All Comments »